BBSA vs. BSV
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBSA) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV).
BBSA and BSV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBSA is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays Short-Term US Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 2019. BSV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. 1-5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both BBSA and BSV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BBSA or BSV.
Key characteristics
| BBSA | BSV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -0.06% | -0.01% |
| 1Y Return | 1.80% | 1.88% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.73% | -0.53% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.04% | 1.17% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.64 | 0.71 |
| Daily Std Dev | 3.04% | 2.90% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.03% | -8.54% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.66% | -2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBSA and BSV is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BBSA vs. BSV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BBSA achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than BSV's -0.01% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBSA vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSA has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BBSA vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBSA) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BBSA vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison
BBSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than BSV's 2.84% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSA JPMorgan BetaBuilders 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.37% | 2.93% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.24% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF | 2.84% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.48% | 1.40% | 1.45% | 1.48% |
Drawdowns
BBSA vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBSA drawdown since its inception was -9.03%, which is greater than BSV's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSA and BSV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BBSA vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBSA) has a higher volatility of 0.97% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) at 0.86%. This indicates that BBSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.