BBMC vs. JEPQ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BBMC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBMC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBMC returned 16.91%/yr vs 18.48%/yr for JEPQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBMC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.

Performance

BBMC vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBMC achieves a 17.81% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 7.89% return.

BBMC

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.02%
• 6M: 10.05%
• YTD: 17.81%
• 1Y: 28.33%
• 3Y*: 16.91%
• 5Y*: 9.21%
• 10Y*: —

JEPQ

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: -1.48%
• 6M: 6.48%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 1Y: 20.98%
• 3Y*: 18.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBMC vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	17.81%	12.24%	15.15%	18.37%	-7.22%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	7.89%	15.18%	24.85%	36.28%	-11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BBMC and JEPQ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022	0.73

The correlation between BBMC and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBMC vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBMC	JEPQ
Industrials	21.6%	2.8%
Technology	13.4%	58.9%
Healthcare	12.9%	3.9%
Financial Services	12.3%	0.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	11.8%
Real Estate	6.8%	0.2%
Basic Materials	5.1%	0.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	6.0%
Energy	3.9%	0.3%
Communication Services	3.8%	13.9%
Utilities	2.6%	1.1%

Return for Risk

BBMC vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBMC

BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 68
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

JEPQ

JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 60
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBMC vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBMC	JEPQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.52	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.08	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.29	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	2.39	+0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.34	10.98	+0.36

BBMC vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBMC and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBMC vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and JEPQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBMC	JEPQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.11%	-20.07%	-10.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.75%	-8.82%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.18%	-20.07%	-4.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.67%	-2.57%	+0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.78%	-3.37%	-5.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	1.92%	+0.58%

Volatility

BBMC vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) is 3.41%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that BBMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBMC	JEPQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.41%	5.76%	-2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.68%	11.42%	+1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.74%	13.83%	+2.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.64%	16.82%	+3.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.00%	16.82%	+4.18%

BBMC vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBMC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBMC vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than JEPQ's 10.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.13%	1.25%	1.31%	1.36%	1.48%	0.87%	0.69%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	10.57%	10.53%	9.65%	10.03%	9.44%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBMC and JEPQ in my portfolio?

BBMC and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBMC or JEPQ?

JEPQ has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to BBMC (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBMC dropped -30.11% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

Which ETF is better, BBMC or JEPQ?

On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 18.48% vs 16.91% for BBMC. On fees, BBMC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BBMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBMC or JEPQ?

Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 18.48% return vs 16.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBMC or JEPQ?

BBMC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBMC or JEPQ?

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.57%, compared with 1.13% for BBMC.

What is the main difference between BBMC and JEPQ?

BBMC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. BBMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBMC and 0.35% for JEPQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.