BBJP vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BBJP (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBJP returned 8.92%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBJP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

BBJP vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBJP achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return.

BBJP

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 6.13%
• YTD: 15.37%
• 6M: 17.26%
• 1Y: 32.02%
• 3Y*: 18.45%
• 5Y*: 8.92%
• 10Y*: —

CIBR

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 31.43%
• YTD: 28.52%
• 6M: 24.03%
• 1Y: 25.78%
• 3Y*: 28.32%
• 5Y*: 16.28%
• 10Y*: 18.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBJP vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF	15.37%	26.55%	7.47%	20.65%	-17.24%	1.21%	15.42%	18.85%	-13.92%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.52%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	-14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BBJP and CIBR is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018	0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between BBJP and CIBR has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BBJP vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBJP	CIBR
Industrials	26.7%	3.5%
Technology	17.8%	94.0%
Financial Services	17.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.6%	-
Communication Services	7.7%	2.6%
Healthcare	6.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	-
Basic Materials	3.2%	-
Real Estate	2.7%	-
Utilities	1.3%	-
Energy	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

BBJP vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBJP

BBJP Risk / Return Rank: 48
BBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
BBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
BBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 49
BBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
BBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 48

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 26
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBJP vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBJP	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.06	+0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	1.56	+0.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.20	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.37	1.18	+1.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.95	2.79	+5.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBJP vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBJP and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBJP	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	1.06	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.66	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.67	-0.22

Drawdowns

BBJP vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBJP drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, roughly equal to the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBJP and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBJP	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.66%	-33.89%	+1.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.60%	-21.99%	+8.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.49%	-21.99%	+7.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.66%	-33.89%	+1.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-2.81%	+1.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.53%	-8.66%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.04%	9.25%	-5.21%

Volatility

BBJP vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) is 4.26%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that BBJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBJP	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	10.90%	-6.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.98%	20.90%	-5.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.44%	24.50%	-5.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.15%	24.95%	-6.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.29%	23.60%	-5.31%

BBJP vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBJP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBJP vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

BBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF	4.65%	5.37%	2.80%	3.05%	1.52%	2.89%	1.12%	2.31%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.45%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBJP and CIBR in my portfolio?

BBJP and CIBR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBJP or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to BBJP (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBJP dropped -32.66% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, BBJP or CIBR?

On 5-year performance, CIBR leads with 16.28% vs 8.92% for BBJP. On fees, BBJP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBJP has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBJP or CIBR?

Over the 5-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBJP or CIBR?

BBJP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBJP or CIBR?

BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.

What is the main difference between BBJP and CIBR?

BBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while CIBR is Technology Equities. BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBJP and 0.60% for CIBR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.