BBJP vs. CIBR
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR).
BBJP and CIBR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBJP is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index. It was launched on Jun 15, 2018. CIBR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. Both BBJP and CIBR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BBJP or CIBR.
Performance
BBJP vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBJP achieves a 6.87% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 15.03% return.
BBJP
6.87%
-3.27%
-0.81%
11.38%
4.66%
N/A
CIBR
15.03%
-0.80%
10.90%
28.22%
16.28%
N/A
Key characteristics
BBJP | CIBR | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 0.67 | 1.59 |
Sortino Ratio | 0.99 | 2.11 |
Omega Ratio | 1.13 | 1.28 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.90 | 2.31 |
Martin Ratio | 2.93 | 6.13 |
Ulcer Index | 3.90% | 4.83% |
Daily Std Dev | 17.10% | 18.58% |
Max Drawdown | -32.66% | -33.89% |
Current Drawdown | -7.15% | -4.32% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBJP vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBJP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between BBJP and CIBR is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BBJP vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BBJP vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
BBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than CIBR's 0.43% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 2.85% | 3.05% | 1.51% | 2.89% | 1.12% | 2.31% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.43% | 0.42% | 0.30% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.22% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
Drawdowns
BBJP vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBJP drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, roughly equal to the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBJP and CIBR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BBJP vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) is 4.19%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that BBJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.