BBHY vs. ISTB
BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and ISTB (iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while ISTB is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the BBG US Universal 1-5 Year Index (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBHY returned 4.03%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for ISTB. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBHY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ISTB.
Performance
BBHY vs. ISTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBHY achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than ISTB's 0.30% return.
BBHY
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- —
ISTB
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- 1.82%
- 10Y*
- 2.26%
BBHY vs. ISTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.29% | 8.51% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -10.37% | 3.88% | 5.36% | 14.35% | -2.50% | 6.57% |
ISTB iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF | 0.30% | 6.36% | 4.37% | 5.56% | -6.08% | -0.71% | 4.75% | 5.61% | 1.02% | 1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHY and ISTB is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, BBHY and ISTB have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.
BBHY vs. ISTB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBHY
ISTB
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
BBHY
ISTB
-
Industrials
BBHY
ISTB
-
Communication Services
BBHY
ISTB
-
Healthcare
BBHY
ISTB
-
Energy
BBHY
ISTB
-
Financial Services
BBHY
ISTB
-
Technology
BBHY
ISTB
-
Real Estate
BBHY
ISTB
Basic Materials
BBHY
ISTB
-
Consumer Defensive
BBHY
ISTB
-
Utilities
BBHY
ISTB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBHY vs. ISTB — Risk / Return Rank
BBHY
ISTB
BBHY vs. ISTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) and iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBHY | ISTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.43 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 3.14 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 11.89 | +1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBHY | ISTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 2.22 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.65 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.83 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
BBHY vs. ISTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBHY drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, which is greater than ISTB's maximum drawdown of -9.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHY and ISTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHY | ISTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.98% | -9.34% | -15.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.37% | -1.26% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.00% | -1.36% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.32% | -9.34% | -5.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -9.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.61% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -1.22% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 0.33% | +0.20% |
Volatility
BBHY vs. ISTB - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) at 0.58%. This indicates that BBHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBHY | ISTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 0.58% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 1.30% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 1.79% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 2.79% | +4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 2.51% | +5.02% |
BBHY vs. ISTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ISTB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBHY vs. ISTB - Dividend Comparison
BBHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than ISTB's 4.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.97% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% | 0.00% |
ISTB iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF | 4.26% | 4.12% | 3.83% | 2.97% | 2.01% | 1.69% | 2.20% | 2.75% | 2.57% | 2.06% | 1.90% | 1.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBHY and ISTB have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBHY has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to ISTB (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBHY dropped -24.98% vs ISTB's -9.34%.
On 5-year performance, BBHY leads with 4.03% vs 1.82% for ISTB. On fees, ISTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISTB has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 4.03% return vs 1.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BBHY.
BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.97%, compared with 4.26% for ISTB.
BBHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ISTB is Short-Term Bond. BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while ISTB tracks BBG US Universal 1-5 Year Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBHY and 0.06% for ISTB.
ISTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBHY and ISTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer