PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBHY vs. ISTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBHY vs. ISTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) and iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBHY achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than ISTB's 0.30% return.


BBHY

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.70%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*

ISTB

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.69%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
1.82%
10Y*
2.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBHY vs. ISTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.29%8.51%7.81%11.98%-10.37%3.88%5.36%14.35%-2.50%6.57%
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
0.30%6.36%4.37%5.56%-6.08%-0.71%4.75%5.61%1.02%1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BBHY and ISTB is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.37

Over the past year, BBHY and ISTB have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

BBHY vs. ISTB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBHY
ISTB

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%

-

Industrials

8.4%

-

Communication Services

7.9%

-

Healthcare

5.4%

-

Energy

5.2%

-

Financial Services

4.1%

-

Technology

4.0%

-

Real Estate

3.9%
0.6%

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.5%

-

Utilities

2.0%
99.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BBHY
10.0%
ISTB

-

Industrials

BBHY
8.4%
ISTB

-

Communication Services

BBHY
7.9%
ISTB

-

Healthcare

BBHY
5.4%
ISTB

-

Energy

BBHY
5.2%
ISTB

-

Financial Services

BBHY
4.1%
ISTB

-

Technology

BBHY
4.0%
ISTB

-

Real Estate

BBHY
3.9%
ISTB
0.6%

Basic Materials

BBHY
3.2%
ISTB

-

Consumer Defensive

BBHY
2.5%
ISTB

-

Utilities

BBHY
2.0%
ISTB
99.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBHY vs. ISTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBHY
BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ISTB
ISTB Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ISTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISTB Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ISTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISTB Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBHY vs. ISTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) and iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBHYISTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.43

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.14

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.98

11.89

+1.09

BBHY vs. ISTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the ISTB Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBHY and ISTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBHYISTBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.22

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.65

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.83

-0.20

Drawdowns

BBHY vs. ISTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBHY drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, which is greater than ISTB's maximum drawdown of -9.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHY and ISTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBHYISTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.98%

-9.34%

-15.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.37%

-1.26%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.00%

-1.36%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.32%

-9.34%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.61%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-1.22%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

0.33%

+0.20%

Volatility

BBHY vs. ISTB - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) at 0.58%. This indicates that BBHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBHYISTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

0.58%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

1.30%

+1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65%

1.79%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.26%

2.79%

+4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.53%

2.51%

+5.02%

BBHY vs. ISTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ISTB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBHY vs. ISTB - Dividend Comparison

BBHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than ISTB's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.97%7.24%7.18%6.49%5.92%4.06%4.73%4.99%5.02%4.81%1.42%0.00%
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
4.26%4.12%3.83%2.97%2.01%1.69%2.20%2.75%2.57%2.06%1.90%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBHY and ISTB have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBHY has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to ISTB (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBHY dropped -24.98% vs ISTB's -9.34%.

On 5-year performance, BBHY leads with 4.03% vs 1.82% for ISTB. On fees, ISTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISTB has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 4.03% return vs 1.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BBHY.

BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.97%, compared with 4.26% for ISTB.

BBHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ISTB is Short-Term Bond. BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while ISTB tracks BBG US Universal 1-5 Year Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBHY and 0.06% for ISTB.

ISTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBHY and ISTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer