BBH vs. VGT
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT).
BBH and VGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Biotech 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. VGT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both BBH and VGT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BBH or VGT.
Performance
BBH vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBH achieves a -1.79% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 28.63% return. Over the past 10 years, BBH has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 3.75%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.73% annualized return.
BBH
-1.79%
-7.32%
-3.36%
8.12%
3.75%
3.75%
VGT
28.63%
2.11%
15.02%
35.48%
22.76%
20.73%
Key characteristics
| BBH | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.52 | 1.71 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.82 | 2.24 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.10 | 1.31 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.27 | 2.36 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.10 | 8.49 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.15% | 4.24% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.88% | 20.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -72.69% | -54.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -25.64% | -1.01% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBH vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between BBH and VGT is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BBH vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BBH vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
BBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than VGT's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBH VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF | 0.44% | 0.43% | 0.47% | 0.21% | 0.36% | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.55% | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% | 1.12% | 1.05% |
Drawdowns
BBH vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBH drawdown since its inception was -72.69%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBH and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BBH vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 6.47%. This indicates that BBH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.