PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBCA vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBCA vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBCA achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.36% return.


BBCA

1D
0.50%
1M
3.24%
6M
10.32%
YTD
11.48%
1Y
31.11%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.28%

SCHD

1D
0.27%
1M
3.61%
6M
13.71%
YTD
24.36%
1Y
31.89%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
12.70%
ALL TIME*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.64M$22.26M$27.98M
$806.58M$724.91M$690.35M

BBCA vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BBCA
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
11.48%34.40%12.79%14.92%-12.53%28.16%6.20%28.93%-15.39%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.36%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BBCA and SCHD is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2018

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between BBCA and SCHD has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BBCA vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBCA
SCHD

Financial Services

41.4%
9.9%

Energy

17.6%
14.1%

Basic Materials

11.3%
1.2%

Industrials

9.2%
7.8%

Technology

7.0%
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
20.6%

Utilities

2.4%
0.1%

Communication Services

0.4%
6.2%

Healthcare

0.2%
20.8%

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Financial Services

BBCA
41.4%
SCHD
9.9%

Energy

BBCA
17.6%
SCHD
14.1%

Basic Materials

BBCA
11.3%
SCHD
1.2%

Industrials

BBCA
9.2%
SCHD
7.8%

Technology

BBCA
7.0%
SCHD
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BBCA
3.3%
SCHD
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

BBCA
3.1%
SCHD
20.6%

Utilities

BBCA
2.4%
SCHD
0.1%

Communication Services

BBCA
0.4%
SCHD
6.2%

Healthcare

BBCA
0.2%
SCHD
20.8%

Real Estate

BBCA
0.2%
SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBCA vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBCA
BBCA Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
BBCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBCA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BBCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBCA Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBCA vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBCASCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.52

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

6.94

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.88

17.53

-2.65

BBCA vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBCA Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBCA and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBCA vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBCA drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCA and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBCASCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.81%

-33.37%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-4.61%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.37%

-16.13%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.43%

-16.85%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.97%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

-3.29%

-2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.82%

+0.28%

Volatility

BBCA vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) is 3.05%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that BBCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBCASCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

3.82%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

7.99%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.82%

11.06%

+2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

14.39%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.00%

16.73%

+3.27%

BBCA vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBCA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBCA vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

BBCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than SCHD's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBCA
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
1.72%1.83%2.36%2.51%2.65%2.17%2.41%2.32%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.12%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBCA and SCHD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to BBCA (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBCA dropped -42.81% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 5-year performance, BBCA leads with 12.37% vs 9.66% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, BBCA has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBCA has performed better with a 12.37% return vs 9.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBCA.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.72% for BBCA.

BBCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. BBCA tracks Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBCA and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBCA and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer