PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBCA vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBCA vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBCA achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.


BBCA

1D
-1.27%
1M
1.57%
YTD
8.72%
6M
12.76%
1Y
29.69%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.01%
6M
18.63%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBCA vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BBCA
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
8.72%34.40%12.79%14.92%-12.53%28.16%6.20%28.93%-15.39%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BBCA and SCHD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between BBCA and SCHD has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BBCA vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBCA
SCHD

Financial Services

38.4%
9.3%

Energy

18.8%
16.2%

Basic Materials

14.4%
1.2%

Industrials

9.9%
7.5%

Technology

8.4%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
19.2%

Utilities

2.0%
0.0%

Communication Services

1.1%
6.3%

Healthcare

0.2%
18.8%

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Financial Services

BBCA
38.4%
SCHD
9.3%

Energy

BBCA
18.8%
SCHD
16.2%

Basic Materials

BBCA
14.4%
SCHD
1.2%

Industrials

BBCA
9.9%
SCHD
7.5%

Technology

BBCA
8.4%
SCHD
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BBCA
3.8%
SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

BBCA
3.2%
SCHD
19.2%

Utilities

BBCA
2.0%
SCHD
0.0%

Communication Services

BBCA
1.1%
SCHD
6.3%

Healthcare

BBCA
0.2%
SCHD
18.8%

Real Estate

BBCA
0.2%
SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBCA vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBCA
BBCA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BBCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBCA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BBCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBCA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBCA vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBCASCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.45

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

5.91

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.56

14.53

+0.03

BBCA vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBCA Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBCA and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBCASCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.49

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.58

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.86

-0.25

Drawdowns

BBCA vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBCA drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCA and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBCASCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.81%

-33.37%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-4.61%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.77%

-16.13%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.43%

-16.85%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-1.40%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-3.32%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.88%

+0.16%

Volatility

BBCA vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that BBCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBCASCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

2.66%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

7.66%

+3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.49%

10.96%

+2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.69%

14.38%

+2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

16.72%

+3.42%

BBCA vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBCA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBCA vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

BBCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBCA
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF
1.74%1.83%2.36%2.51%2.65%2.17%2.41%2.32%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBCA and SCHD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBCA has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBCA dropped -42.81% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 5-year performance, BBCA leads with 11.39% vs 8.36% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBCA has performed better with a 11.39% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBCA.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.74% for BBCA.

BBCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. BBCA tracks Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBCA and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBCA and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer