BBBS vs. CLOZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BBBS (Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) and CLOZ (Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBBS is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index, while CLOZ is a CLO fund actively managed by Panagram. BBBS is passively managed, while CLOZ is actively managed. Over the past year, BBBS returned 4.44% vs 6.62% for CLOZ. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBBS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CLOZ.

Performance

BBBS vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBBS achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 2.62% return.

BBBS

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 4.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOZ

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 2.62%
• 6M: 3.25%
• 1Y: 6.62%
• 3Y*: 10.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBBS vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BBBS Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF	0.77%	6.67%	4.96%
CLOZ Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF	2.62%	5.99%	10.55%

Correlation

The correlation between BBBS and CLOZ is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024	0.04

Return for Risk

BBBS vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBBS

BBBS Risk / Return Rank: 74
BBBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BBBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
BBBS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BBBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
BBBS Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 53
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBBS vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBBS	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	1.93	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.73	2.47	+1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.50	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	1.70	+1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.59	5.66	+6.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBBS vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBBS and CLOZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBBS	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	1.93	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.37	2.77	-0.41

Drawdowns

BBBS vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBBS drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum CLOZ drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBS and CLOZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBBS	CLOZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.45%	-5.32%	+3.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.45%	-3.90%	+2.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.03%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-0.38%	+0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.35%	1.17%	-0.82%

Volatility

BBBS vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) has a higher volatility of 0.49% compared to Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ) at 0.42%. This indicates that BBBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBBS	CLOZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.49%	0.42%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.36%	3.13%	-1.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87%	3.45%	-1.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.23%	3.80%	-1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.23%	3.80%	-1.57%

BBBS vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBBS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBBS vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

BBBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than CLOZ's 7.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BBBS Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF	4.58%	4.55%	4.31%	0.00%
CLOZ Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF	7.38%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBBS and CLOZ in my portfolio?

BBBS and CLOZ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBBS or CLOZ?

BBBS has higher volatility (0.49%) compared to CLOZ (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBS dropped -1.45% vs CLOZ's -5.32%.

Which ETF is better, BBBS or CLOZ?

On 1-year performance, CLOZ leads with 6.62% vs 4.44% for BBBS. On fees, BBBS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBBS or CLOZ?

Over the 1-year period, CLOZ has performed better with a 6.62% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBBS or CLOZ?

BBBS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBBS or CLOZ?

CLOZ has the higher dividend yield at 7.38%, compared with 4.58% for BBBS.

What is the main difference between BBBS and CLOZ?

BBBS is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while CLOZ is CLO. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Panagram. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBS and 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.