BBAX vs. IVV
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).
BBAX and IVV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBAX is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index. It was launched on Aug 7, 2018. IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000. Both BBAX and IVV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BBAX or IVV.
Correlation
The correlation between BBAX and IVV is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BBAX vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BBAX:
0.34
IVV:
2.25
BBAX:
0.58
IVV:
2.98
BBAX:
1.07
IVV:
1.42
BBAX:
0.41
IVV:
3.32
BBAX:
1.39
IVV:
14.68
BBAX:
3.82%
IVV:
1.90%
BBAX:
15.56%
IVV:
12.43%
BBAX:
-39.64%
IVV:
-55.25%
BBAX:
-10.12%
IVV:
-2.52%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBAX achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 25.92% return.
BBAX
1.92%
-5.33%
2.37%
3.28%
3.26%
N/A
IVV
25.92%
0.33%
9.27%
26.64%
14.77%
13.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBAX vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BBAX vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BBAX vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
BBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than IVV's 1.29% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBAX JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF | 3.32% | 4.17% | 5.06% | 5.47% | 2.57% | 4.07% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.99% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% | 1.83% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
BBAX vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBAX and IVV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BBAX vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 3.75%. This indicates that BBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.