BAX vs. HTGC

In the year-to-date period, BAX achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly higher than HTGC's -9.14% return. Over the past 10 years, BAX has underperformed HTGC with an annualized return of -0.72%, while HTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.50% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baxter International Inc. (BAX) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the HTGC Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAX and HTGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than HTGC's 8.93% yield.

The maximum BAX drawdown since its inception was -68.86%, roughly equal to the maximum HTGC drawdown of -68.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAX and HTGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Baxter International Inc. (BAX) has a higher volatility of 18.92% compared to Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) at 13.55%. This indicates that BAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Baxter International Inc. and Hercules Capital, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.