BATT vs. TLT
BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BATT is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund actively managed by Amplify, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. BATT is actively managed, while TLT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BATT returned -1.58%/yr vs -8.10%/yr for TLT. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BATT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
BATT vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATT achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -2.43% return.
BATT
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -4.72%
- YTD
- 8.33%
- 1Y
- 53.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- -1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.43%
TLT
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- 6M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- -2.43%
- 1Y
- -1.64%
- 3Y*
- -0.90%
- 5Y*
- -8.10%
- 10Y*
- -2.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $654.74K | $762.69K | $1.26M | |
| $2.59B | $2.11B | $2.22B |
BATT vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 8.33% | 59.70% | -13.93% | -7.05% | -32.25% | 16.52% | 44.43% | -2.40% | -42.27% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -2.43% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | 3.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between BATT and TLT is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018 | -0.06 |
The correlation between BATT and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BATT vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
BATT
TLT
BATT vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BATT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.98 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | -0.21 | +2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | -0.45 | +7.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BATT vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than TLT's maximum drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -48.35% | -21.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.02% | -7.74% | -15.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.26% | -14.79% | -30.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.98% | -43.70% | -18.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.08% | -41.73% | +24.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.38% | -14.00% | -20.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.25% | 3.63% | +4.62% |
Volatility
BATT vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a higher volatility of 10.55% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.67%. This indicates that BATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BATT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.55% | 2.67% | +7.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.41% | 6.88% | +20.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.77% | 9.25% | +24.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.04% | 15.75% | +14.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.79% | 14.83% | +15.96% |
BATT vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BATT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BATT vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than TLT's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 1.71% | 1.85% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 4.14% | 2.32% | 0.21% | 3.22% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.71% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BATT and TLT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BATT has higher volatility (10.55%) compared to TLT (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATT dropped -69.38% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 5-year performance, BATT leads with -1.58% vs -8.10% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BATT has performed better with a -1.58% return vs -8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BATT.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 1.71% for BATT.
BATT is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while TLT is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BATT and 0.15% for TLT.
BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BATT and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer