BATT vs. BND
BATT (Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BATT is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Amplify, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. BATT is actively managed, while BND is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BATT returned 3.45%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for BND. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BATT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
BATT vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATT achieves a 26.16% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.27% return.
BATT
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 26.16%
- 6M
- 29.61%
- 1Y
- 103.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
BATT vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 26.16% | 59.70% | -13.93% | -7.05% | -32.25% | 16.52% | 44.43% | -2.40% | -42.45% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.27% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between BATT and BND is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2018 | 0.05 |
The correlation between BATT and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BATT vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
BATT
BND
BATT vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BATT | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.24 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.12 | 1.92 | +4.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.20 | 5.80 | +16.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BATT | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38 | 1.36 | +2.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.01 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.59 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
BATT vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATT and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATT | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -18.58% | -50.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.03% | -2.68% | -14.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.65% | -5.92% | -41.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.98% | -17.91% | -44.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.44% | -2.37% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.78% | -3.06% | -31.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.68% | 0.88% | +3.80% |
Volatility
BATT vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.23%. This indicates that BATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BATT | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.29% | 1.23% | +9.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.67% | 2.66% | +22.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.80% | 3.78% | +27.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.57% | 6.02% | +23.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.60% | 5.53% | +25.07% |
BATT vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
BATT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BATT vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
BATT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than BND's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATT Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | 1.47% | 1.85% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 4.14% | 2.32% | 0.21% | 3.22% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.97% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BATT and BND have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BATT has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to BND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATT dropped -69.38% vs BND's -18.58%.
On 5-year performance, BATT leads with 3.45% vs 0.09% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BATT has performed better with a 3.45% return vs 0.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BATT.
BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 1.47% for BATT.
BATT is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BATT and 0.03% for BND.
BATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BATT and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer