BATRK vs. ICLN
BATRK (The Liberty Braves Group) is a stock, while ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Over the past 10 years, BATRK returned 13.05%/yr vs 11.38%/yr for ICLN. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BATRK vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BATRK achieves a 30.82% return, which is significantly higher than ICLN's 26.14% return. Over the past 10 years, BATRK has outperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 13.05%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively lower 11.38% annualized return.
BATRK
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 30.82%
- 6M
- 31.49%
- 1Y
- 10.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- 13.05%
ICLN
- 1D
- -4.44%
- 1M
- -7.52%
- YTD
- 26.14%
- 6M
- 25.31%
- 1Y
- 64.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.74%
- 5Y*
- -0.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
BATRK vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATRK The Liberty Braves Group | 30.82% | 3.11% | -3.34% | 22.80% | 14.70% | 12.94% | -15.78% | 18.68% | 12.02% | 7.92% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 26.14% | 47.05% | -25.72% | -20.41% | -5.43% | -24.18% | 141.82% | 44.36% | -9.03% | 21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between BATRK and ICLN is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2016 | 0.31 |
The correlation between BATRK and ICLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BATRK vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank
BATRK
ICLN
BATRK vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Liberty Braves Group (BATRK) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BATRK | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.36 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 3.96 | -3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 13.73 | -12.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BATRK vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BATRK drawdown since its inception was -54.95%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATRK and ICLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BATRK | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.95% | -87.15% | +32.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.72% | -16.38% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.63% | -43.18% | +23.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.39% | -57.16% | +33.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.95% | -66.75% | +11.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -43.56% | +43.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.13% | -66.53% | +53.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.49% | 4.71% | +5.78% |
Volatility
BATRK vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Liberty Braves Group (BATRK) is 5.24%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 13.47%. This indicates that BATRK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BATRK | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 13.47% | -8.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.24% | 23.14% | -8.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.67% | 28.52% | -9.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.65% | 27.69% | -5.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.43% | 27.33% | +2.10% |
Dividends
BATRK vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison
BATRK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BATRK The Liberty Braves Group | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 0.89% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BATRK and ICLN have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICLN has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to BATRK (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATRK dropped -54.95% vs ICLN's -87.15%.
ICLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BATRK and ICLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer