PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BATRK vs. ICLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BATRK vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Liberty Braves Group (BATRK) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATRK achieves a 22.64% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 40.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BATRK having a 12.48% annualized return and ICLN not far behind at 11.99%.


BATRK

1D
-1.95%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
22.64%
6M
25.43%
1Y
19.78%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
12.81%
10Y*
12.48%

ICLN

1D
-2.78%
1M
11.22%
YTD
40.54%
6M
39.84%
1Y
83.73%
3Y*
8.92%
5Y*
2.10%
10Y*
11.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATRK vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BATRK
The Liberty Braves Group
22.64%3.11%-3.34%22.80%14.70%12.94%-15.78%18.68%12.02%7.92%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
40.54%47.05%-25.72%-20.41%-5.43%-24.18%141.82%44.36%-9.03%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BATRK and ICLN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2016

0.32

The correlation between BATRK and ICLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BATRK vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATRK
BATRK Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BATRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATRK Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BATRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATRK Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ICLN
ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATRK vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Liberty Braves Group (BATRK) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BATRKICLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.48

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

7.50

-6.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

21.35

-19.45

BATRK vs. ICLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATRK Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATRK and ICLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BATRKICLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

3.20

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.08

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.44

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

-0.08

+0.40

Drawdowns

BATRK vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATRK drawdown since its inception was -54.95%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATRK and ICLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BATRKICLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.95%

-87.15%

+32.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.72%

-11.22%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.63%

-43.18%

+23.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.39%

-57.16%

+33.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.95%

-66.75%

+11.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.47%

-37.13%

+31.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-66.61%

+56.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.48%

3.94%

+6.54%

Volatility

BATRK vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Liberty Braves Group (BATRK) is 5.86%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 9.53%. This indicates that BATRK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BATRKICLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

9.53%

-3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.00%

20.21%

-6.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.65%

26.38%

-6.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.62%

27.21%

-4.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.47%

27.20%

+2.27%

Dividends

BATRK vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

BATRK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATRK
The Liberty Braves Group
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
1.16%1.63%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


BATRK and ICLN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICLN has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to BATRK (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATRK dropped -54.95% vs ICLN's -87.15%.

ICLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BATRK and ICLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer