BARK vs. GPRE
BARK (BARK, Inc.) and GPRE (Green Plains Inc.) are both stocks. BARK operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while GPRE operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, BARK returned -45.47%/yr vs -14.89%/yr for GPRE. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BARK vs. GPRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BARK achieves a -20.66% return, which is significantly lower than GPRE's 49.39% return.
BARK
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- -20.66%
- 6M
- -26.29%
- 1Y
- -41.23%
- 3Y*
- -30.44%
- 5Y*
- -45.47%
- 10Y*
- —
GPRE
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- 49.39%
- 6M
- 45.96%
- 1Y
- 158.20%
- 3Y*
- -21.44%
- 5Y*
- -14.89%
- 10Y*
- -1.63%
BARK vs. GPRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BARK BARK, Inc. | -20.66% | -67.26% | 128.43% | -45.94% | -64.69% | -71.02% | 12.00% |
GPRE Green Plains Inc. | 49.39% | 3.38% | -62.41% | -17.31% | -12.26% | 163.93% | 2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BARK and GPRE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2020 | 0.27 |
The correlation between BARK and GPRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BARK:
-$6.09
GPRE:
-$0.21
BARK:
0.16
GPRE:
0.57
BARK:
$394.84M
GPRE:
$1.94B
BARK:
$241.89M
GPRE:
$35.45M
BARK:
-$29.51M
GPRE:
$113.84M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BARK vs. GPRE — Risk / Return Rank
BARK
GPRE
BARK vs. GPRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BARK, Inc. (BARK) and Green Plains Inc. (GPRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BARK | GPRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.34 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 7.52 | -8.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | 14.27 | -15.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BARK vs. GPRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BARK drawdown since its inception was -97.76%, roughly equal to the maximum GPRE drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BARK and GPRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BARK | GPRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.76% | -98.00% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.27% | -21.17% | -41.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.71% | -90.71% | +8.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.25% | -92.48% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.42% | -72.42% | -25.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.71% | -68.02% | -15.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.23% | 11.13% | +26.10% |
Volatility
BARK vs. GPRE - Volatility Comparison
BARK, Inc. (BARK) has a higher volatility of 25.48% compared to Green Plains Inc. (GPRE) at 10.52%. This indicates that BARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BARK | GPRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.48% | 10.52% | +14.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.97% | 38.71% | +18.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.43% | 66.38% | +5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.49% | 60.28% | +14.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.92% | 61.02% | +12.90% |
Dividends
BARK vs. GPRE - Dividend Comparison
Neither BARK nor GPRE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BARK BARK, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPRE Green Plains Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 3.66% | 2.85% | 1.72% | 1.75% |
Financials
BARK vs. GPRE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BARK, Inc. and Green Plains Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BARK vs. GPRE - Profitability Comparison
BARK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BARK, Inc. reported a gross profit of 56.38M and revenue of 86.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.1%.
GPRE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Plains Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 445.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BARK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BARK, Inc. reported an operating income of -12.61M and revenue of 86.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -14.6%.
GPRE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Plains Inc. reported an operating income of 44.77M and revenue of 445.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
BARK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BARK, Inc. reported a net income of -12.66M and revenue of 86.57M, resulting in a net margin of -14.6%.
GPRE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Green Plains Inc. reported a net income of 32.94M and revenue of 445.80M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BARK and GPRE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BARK has higher volatility (25.48%) compared to GPRE (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BARK dropped -97.76% vs GPRE's -98.00%.
GPRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BARK and GPRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer