PortfoliosLab logo
BANF vs. RF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BANF and RF is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BANF vs. RF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BancFirst Corporation (BANF) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BANF:

1.29

RF:

0.56

Sortino Ratio

BANF:

2.02

RF:

1.02

Omega Ratio

BANF:

1.25

RF:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

BANF:

1.49

RF:

0.55

Martin Ratio

BANF:

5.10

RF:

1.48

Ulcer Index

BANF:

8.04%

RF:

11.95%

Daily Std Dev

BANF:

32.94%

RF:

30.79%

Max Drawdown

BANF:

-59.39%

RF:

-92.65%

Current Drawdown

BANF:

-0.36%

RF:

-17.38%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BANF:

$4.24B

RF:

$20.00B

EPS

BANF:

$6.61

RF:

$2.07

PE Ratio

BANF:

19.28

RF:

10.75

PEG Ratio

BANF:

2.08

RF:

2.74

PS Ratio

BANF:

6.63

RF:

3.00

PB Ratio

BANF:

2.45

RF:

1.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

BANF:

$727.64M

RF:

$8.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BANF:

$502.77M

RF:

$8.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

BANF:

$292.60M

RF:

$3.14B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BANF achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly higher than RF's -4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, BANF has outperformed RF with an annualized return of 18.45%, while RF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.18% annualized return.


BANF

YTD

9.19%

1M

23.99%

6M

1.52%

1Y

42.09%

5Y*

34.94%

10Y*

18.45%

RF

YTD

-4.39%

1M

17.29%

6M

-13.38%

1Y

17.16%

5Y*

25.17%

10Y*

12.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BANF vs. RF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BANF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BANF is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BANF is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BANF is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BANF is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BANF is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BANF is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

RF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RF is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RF is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RF is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RF is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RF is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RF is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BANF vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BancFirst Corporation (BANF) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BANF Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the RF Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BANF and RF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BANF vs. RF - Dividend Comparison

BANF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than RF's 4.45% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BANF
BancFirst Corporation
1.42%1.52%1.71%1.72%1.98%2.25%1.99%2.04%1.56%1.59%2.39%2.05%
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
4.45%4.17%4.54%3.43%2.98%3.85%3.44%3.44%1.82%1.78%2.40%1.70%

Drawdowns

BANF vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BANF drawdown since its inception was -59.39%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BANF and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BANF vs. RF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BancFirst Corporation (BANF) is 6.05%, while Regions Financial Corporation (RF) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that BANF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BANF vs. RF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BancFirst Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
156.40M
2.32B
(BANF) Total Revenue
(RF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items