PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BANF vs. RF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BANFRF
YTD Return28.13%40.58%
1Y Return42.93%70.57%
3Y Return (Ann)24.43%7.15%
5Y Return (Ann)18.46%14.34%
10Y Return (Ann)16.14%13.80%
Sharpe Ratio1.252.59
Sortino Ratio2.133.62
Omega Ratio1.261.45
Calmar Ratio1.472.24
Martin Ratio4.4914.19
Ulcer Index9.26%5.19%
Daily Std Dev33.38%28.45%
Max Drawdown-59.39%-92.65%
Current Drawdown-2.98%-0.15%

Fundamentals


BANFRF
Market Cap$4.18B$23.79B
EPS$6.22$1.77
PE Ratio20.2914.79
PEG Ratio2.084.84
Total Revenue (TTM)$672.73M$8.07B
Gross Profit (TTM)$604.26M$8.09B
EBITDA (TTM)$76.04M$1.45B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between BANF and RF is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

BANF vs. RF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BANF achieves a 28.13% return, which is significantly lower than RF's 40.58% return. Over the past 10 years, BANF has outperformed RF with an annualized return of 16.14%, while RF has yielded a comparatively lower 13.80% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
35.92%
33.79%
BANF
RF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BANF vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BancFirst Corporation (BANF) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BANF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BANF, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.25
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BANF, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.13
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BANF, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BANF, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.47
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BANF, currently valued at 4.49, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.49
RF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RF, currently valued at 2.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RF, currently valued at 3.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.62
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RF, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RF, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RF, currently valued at 14.19, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0014.19

BANF vs. RF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BANF Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the RF Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BANF and RF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.25
2.59
BANF
RF

Dividends

BANF vs. RF - Dividend Comparison

BANF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than RF's 3.69% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BANF
BancFirst Corporation
1.42%1.71%1.72%1.98%2.25%1.99%2.04%1.56%1.59%2.39%2.05%3.18%
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
3.69%4.54%3.43%2.98%3.85%3.44%3.44%1.82%1.78%2.40%1.70%1.01%

Drawdowns

BANF vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BANF drawdown since its inception was -59.39%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BANF and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.98%
-0.15%
BANF
RF

Volatility

BANF vs. RF - Volatility Comparison

BancFirst Corporation (BANF) has a higher volatility of 18.07% compared to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 12.29%. This indicates that BANF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
18.07%
12.29%
BANF
RF

Financials

BANF vs. RF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BancFirst Corporation and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items