PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BANF vs. FHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BANF vs. FHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BancFirst Corporation (BANF) and First Hawaiian, Inc. (FHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BANF achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly lower than FHB's 14.27% return.


BANF

1D
0.03%
1M
0.03%
YTD
5.50%
6M
0.81%
1Y
-5.28%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
16.33%

FHB

1D
1.47%
1M
3.62%
YTD
14.27%
6M
9.26%
1Y
26.55%
3Y*
22.39%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BANF vs. FHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BANF
BancFirst Corporation
5.50%-8.04%22.62%12.44%27.10%22.79%-2.90%27.93%-0.62%11.72%
FHB
First Hawaiian, Inc.
14.27%1.64%18.72%-7.56%-0.92%20.39%-13.84%33.26%-20.12%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BANF and FHB is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2016

0.71

The correlation between BANF and FHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

BANF:

$7.11

FHB:

$2.29

PE Ratio

BANF:

15.67

FHB:

12.40

PEG Ratio

BANF:

1.73

FHB:

4.94

PS Ratio

BANF:

4.57

FHB:

3.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

BANF:

$824.33M

FHB:

$1.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BANF:

$683.43M

FHB:

$635.99M

EBITDA (TTM)

BANF:

$325.92M

FHB:

$294.52M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BANF vs. FHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BANF
BANF Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BANF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BANF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BANF Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BANF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BANF Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FHB
FHB Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BANF vs. FHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BancFirst Corporation (BANF) and First Hawaiian, Inc. (FHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BANFFHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.20

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

1.82

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

4.63

-4.98

BANF vs. FHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BANF Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the FHB Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BANF and FHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BANF vs. FHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BANF drawdown since its inception was -57.10%, roughly equal to the maximum FHB drawdown of -55.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BANF and FHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BANFFHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.10%

-55.51%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.63%

-14.65%

-8.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.63%

-24.26%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.97%

-47.02%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.36%

-1.22%

-16.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.96%

-16.85%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.06%

5.75%

+9.31%

Volatility

BANF vs. FHB - Volatility Comparison

BancFirst Corporation (BANF) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to First Hawaiian, Inc. (FHB) at 5.95%. This indicates that BANF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BANFFHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.90%

5.95%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.54%

17.28%

+2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.21%

24.10%

+3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.24%

29.79%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.74%

32.48%

+3.26%

Dividends

BANF vs. FHB - Dividend Comparison

BANF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than FHB's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BANF
BancFirst Corporation
1.73%1.79%1.52%1.71%1.72%1.98%2.25%1.99%2.04%1.56%1.59%2.39%
FHB
First Hawaiian, Inc.
3.67%4.11%4.01%4.55%3.99%3.81%4.41%3.60%4.26%3.02%0.57%0.00%

Financials

BANF vs. FHB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BancFirst Corporation and First Hawaiian, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
181.00M
229.70M
(BANF) Total Revenue
(FHB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BANF vs. FHB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BancFirst Corporation and First Hawaiian, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
0
Portfolio components
BANF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BancFirst Corporation reported a gross profit of 181.00M and revenue of 181.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

FHB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Hawaiian, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 229.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BANF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BancFirst Corporation reported an operating income of 73.61M and revenue of 181.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.7%.

FHB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Hawaiian, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 229.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

BANF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BancFirst Corporation reported a net income of 59.50M and revenue of 181.00M, resulting in a net margin of 32.9%.

FHB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Hawaiian, Inc. reported a net income of 67.78M and revenue of 229.70M, resulting in a net margin of 29.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BANF and FHB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BANF has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to FHB (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BANF dropped -57.10% vs FHB's -55.51%.

FHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BANF and FHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer