BANC vs. ZIM
BANC (Banc of California, Inc.) and ZIM (ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.) are both stocks. BANC operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while ZIM operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, BANC returned 4.71%/yr vs 21.87%/yr for ZIM. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BANC vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BANC achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than ZIM's 22.66% return.
BANC
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- 6M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 38.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 4.71%
- 10Y*
- 1.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.22%
ZIM
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- 6M
- 18.20%
- YTD
- 22.66%
- 1Y
- 72.24%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 21.87%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 49.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $105.28M | $72.29M | $62.21M | |
| $18.00M | $25.35M | $31.22M |
BANC vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BANC Banc of California, Inc. | 0.59% | 28.05% | 18.32% | -13.04% | -17.67% | 16.88% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 22.66% | 28.11% | 176.93% | -21.06% | -52.70% | 463.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between BANC and ZIM is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
BANC:
$2.94B
ZIM:
$3.04B
BANC:
-$0.13
ZIM:
$0.81
BANC:
1.71
ZIM:
0.48
BANC:
1.11
ZIM:
0.79
BANC:
$1.78B
ZIM:
$6.29B
BANC:
$945.22M
ZIM:
$676.00M
BANC:
$8.26M
ZIM:
$1.73B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BANC vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank
BANC
ZIM
BANC vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banc of California, Inc. (BANC) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BANC | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 2.28 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.47 | 5.41 | -0.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BANC vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BANC drawdown since its inception was -82.29%, roughly equal to the maximum ZIM drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BANC and ZIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BANC | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.29% | -84.68% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.47% | -29.84% | +9.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.21% | -56.18% | +24.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.31% | -84.68% | +31.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.28% | -11.77% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.69% | -39.23% | +9.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.88% | 12.54% | -4.66% |
Volatility
BANC vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison
Banc of California, Inc. (BANC) has a higher volatility of 15.77% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) at 11.11%. This indicates that BANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BANC | ZIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.77% | 11.11% | +4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.56% | 34.35% | -10.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.96% | 52.13% | -20.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.68% | 65.10% | -28.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.30% | 66.98% | -23.68% |
Dividends
BANC vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison
BANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than ZIM's 4.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BANC Banc of California, Inc. | 2.30% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 2.98% | 1.51% | 1.22% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 3.91% | 2.52% | 2.82% | 3.28% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 4.96% | 20.16% | 22.40% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BANC vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banc of California, Inc. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BANC vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison
BANC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Banc of California, Inc. reported a gross profit of 88.71M and revenue of 414.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.4%.
ZIM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 46.80M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.4%.
BANC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Banc of California, Inc. reported an operating income of -335.24M and revenue of 414.60M, resulting in an operating margin of -80.9%.
ZIM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of -39.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.
BANC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Banc of California, Inc. reported a net income of -240.25M and revenue of 414.60M, resulting in a net margin of -58.0%.
ZIM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BANC and ZIM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BANC has higher volatility (15.77%) compared to ZIM (11.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BANC dropped -82.29% vs ZIM's -84.68%.
ZIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BANC and ZIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer