PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BAMG vs. BTHM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BAMG and BTHM is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

BAMG vs. BTHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
15.54%
11.54%
BAMG
BTHM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BAMG:

2.02

BTHM:

2.44

Sortino Ratio

BAMG:

2.70

BTHM:

3.25

Omega Ratio

BAMG:

1.35

BTHM:

1.44

Calmar Ratio

BAMG:

3.66

BTHM:

3.85

Martin Ratio

BAMG:

14.32

BTHM:

15.91

Ulcer Index

BAMG:

1.95%

BTHM:

2.24%

Daily Std Dev

BAMG:

13.84%

BTHM:

14.64%

Max Drawdown

BAMG:

-7.63%

BTHM:

-26.54%

Current Drawdown

BAMG:

-1.73%

BTHM:

-2.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMG achieves a 27.61% return, which is significantly lower than BTHM's 35.63% return.


BAMG

YTD

27.61%

1M

1.87%

6M

15.54%

1Y

27.90%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BTHM

YTD

35.63%

1M

0.84%

6M

11.54%

1Y

35.69%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAMG vs. BTHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BTHM's 0.60% expense ratio.


BAMG
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF
Expense ratio chart for BAMG: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for BTHM: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAMG vs. BTHM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAMG, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.022.44
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAMG, currently valued at 2.70, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.703.25
The chart of Omega ratio for BAMG, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.351.44
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAMG, currently valued at 3.66, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.663.85
The chart of Martin ratio for BAMG, currently valued at 14.32, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0014.3215.91
BAMG
BTHM

The current BAMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the BTHM Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMG and BTHM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.002.503.003.50Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10Nov 17Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15Dec 22
2.02
2.44
BAMG
BTHM

Dividends

BAMG vs. BTHM - Dividend Comparison

BAMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than BTHM's 0.70% yield.


TTM20232022
BAMG
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF
0.12%0.12%0.00%
BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
0.70%0.55%0.90%

Drawdowns

BAMG vs. BTHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMG drawdown since its inception was -7.63%, smaller than the maximum BTHM drawdown of -26.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMG and BTHM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-1.73%
-2.04%
BAMG
BTHM

Volatility

BAMG vs. BTHM - Volatility Comparison

Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) have volatilities of 4.39% and 4.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.39%
4.24%
BAMG
BTHM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab