PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BAMG vs. BTHM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BAMGBTHM
YTD Return16.42%24.58%
Daily Std Dev14.07%14.59%
Max Drawdown-7.63%-26.54%
Current Drawdown0.00%-0.76%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between BAMG and BTHM is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

BAMG vs. BTHM - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BAMG achieves a 16.42% return, which is significantly lower than BTHM's 24.58% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
30.29%
38.05%
BAMG
BTHM

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAMG vs. BTHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BTHM's 0.60% expense ratio.


BAMG
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF
Expense ratio chart for BAMG: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for BTHM: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAMG vs. BTHM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMG
Sharpe ratio
No data
BTHM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 2.25, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.25
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 3.05, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.39
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 2.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BTHM, currently valued at 12.09, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0012.09

BAMG vs. BTHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

BAMG vs. BTHM - Dividend Comparison

BAMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than BTHM's 0.31% yield.


TTM20232022
BAMG
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF
0.12%0.12%0.00%
BTHM
Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF
0.31%0.55%0.90%

Drawdowns

BAMG vs. BTHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMG drawdown since its inception was -7.63%, smaller than the maximum BTHM drawdown of -26.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMG and BTHM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember0
-0.76%
BAMG
BTHM

Volatility

BAMG vs. BTHM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) is 4.46%, while Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that BAMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.46%
5.14%
BAMG
BTHM