BAMG vs. BTHM

In the year-to-date period, BAMG achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly higher than BTHM's -0.07% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BAMG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BTHM's 0.60% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) and Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BAMG Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the BTHM Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMG and BTHM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BAMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than BTHM's 0.71% yield.

The maximum BAMG drawdown since its inception was -21.00%, smaller than the maximum BTHM drawdown of -26.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMG and BTHM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Blackrock Future U.S. Themes ETF (BTHM) at 6.09%. This indicates that BAMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.