PortfoliosLab logo
BAM.TO vs. XIU.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BAM.TO and XIU.TO is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

BAM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BAM.TO:

1.53

XIU.TO:

1.59

Sortino Ratio

BAM.TO:

2.13

XIU.TO:

2.24

Omega Ratio

BAM.TO:

1.29

XIU.TO:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

BAM.TO:

1.77

XIU.TO:

1.91

Martin Ratio

BAM.TO:

5.41

XIU.TO:

8.53

Ulcer Index

BAM.TO:

9.95%

XIU.TO:

2.76%

Daily Std Dev

BAM.TO:

32.58%

XIU.TO:

14.15%

Max Drawdown

BAM.TO:

-30.37%

XIU.TO:

-52.31%

Current Drawdown

BAM.TO:

-11.27%

XIU.TO:

-0.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAM.TO achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than XIU.TO's 7.00% return.


BAM.TO

YTD

0.74%

1M

5.56%

6M

-2.11%

1Y

49.73%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XIU.TO

YTD

7.00%

1M

5.19%

6M

3.39%

1Y

21.12%

3Y*

11.16%

5Y*

14.81%

10Y*

9.20%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Brookfield Asset Management Ltd

iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAM.TO vs. XIU.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAM.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAM.TO is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAM.TO is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAM.TO is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAM.TO is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAM.TO is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAM.TO is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XIU.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XIU.TO is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XIU.TO is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XIU.TO is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XIU.TO is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XIU.TO is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XIU.TO is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BAM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BAM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAM.TO and XIU.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BAM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Dividend Comparison

BAM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than XIU.TO's 2.85% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BAM.TO
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd
3.38%3.08%3.24%20.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF
2.85%2.92%3.16%3.02%2.43%3.03%2.87%3.18%2.58%2.65%3.19%2.65%

Drawdowns

BAM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAM.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.37%, smaller than the maximum XIU.TO drawdown of -52.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM.TO and XIU.TO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BAM.TO vs. XIU.TO - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) at 2.23%. This indicates that BAM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...