PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BALT vs. AGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BALT vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BALT vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
-0.00%6.65%9.98%7.45%2.54%0.82%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.09%7.19%1.31%5.65%-13.02%-0.05%

Returns By Period


BALT

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
2.06%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
10Y*

AGG

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
0.09%
6M
0.78%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BALT vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BALT vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BALT
BALT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BALT vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BALTAGGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

0.93

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.32

1.32

+1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.17

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.76

+0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.95

4.89

+8.06

BALT vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BALT Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BALT and AGG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BALTAGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

0.93

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

0.60

+1.12

Correlation

The correlation between BALT and AGG is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BALT vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

BALT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.95%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%

Drawdowns

BALT vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BALT drawdown since its inception was -4.89%, smaller than the maximum AGG drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALT and AGG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BALTAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.89%

-18.43%

+13.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.48%

-2.52%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-2.30%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-2.71%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

0.91%

-0.39%

Volatility

BALT vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) is 0.62%, while iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that BALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BALTAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

1.67%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

2.55%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.48%

4.37%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.36%

6.07%

-2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.36%

5.39%

-2.03%