BALT vs. AGG
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG).
BALT and AGG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BALT is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jul 1, 2021. AGG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2003.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BALT or AGG.
Correlation
The correlation between BALT and AGG is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BALT vs. AGG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BALT:
3.15
AGG:
0.39
BALT:
4.61
AGG:
0.57
BALT:
1.72
AGG:
1.07
BALT:
5.22
AGG:
0.16
BALT:
27.94
AGG:
1.13
BALT:
0.35%
AGG:
1.90%
BALT:
3.06%
AGG:
5.49%
BALT:
-2.16%
AGG:
-18.43%
BALT:
-0.76%
AGG:
-8.89%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BALT achieves a 9.38% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 1.36% return.
BALT
9.38%
0.32%
4.31%
9.76%
N/A
N/A
AGG
1.36%
-0.18%
1.20%
2.02%
-0.32%
1.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BALT vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.05% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BALT vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BALT vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison
BALT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BALT Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.74% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.70% | 2.96% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.40% | 2.32% |
Drawdowns
BALT vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BALT drawdown since its inception was -2.16%, smaller than the maximum AGG drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALT and AGG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BALT vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) is 0.84%, while iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) has a volatility of 1.58%. This indicates that BALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.