BALI vs. RDVI
BALI (Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF) and RDVI (FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. BALI is actively managed, while RDVI is passively managed. Over the past year, BALI returned 25.38% vs 31.37% for RDVI. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BALI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RDVI.
Performance
BALI vs. RDVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BALI achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly lower than RDVI's 14.84% return.
BALI
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 10.07%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 25.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDVI
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 6M
- 13.24%
- 1Y
- 31.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BALI vs. RDVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BALI Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF | 10.07% | 14.51% | 22.38% | 9.71% |
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 14.84% | 17.93% | 14.56% | 12.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between BALI and RDVI is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023 | 0.70 |
The correlation between BALI and RDVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
BALI vs. RDVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BALI
RDVI
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Technology
BALI
RDVI
Communication Services
BALI
RDVI
Consumer Cyclical
BALI
RDVI
Healthcare
BALI
RDVI
Financial Services
BALI
RDVI
Industrials
BALI
RDVI
Consumer Defensive
BALI
RDVI
Energy
BALI
RDVI
Real Estate
BALI
RDVI
-
Utilities
BALI
RDVI
Basic Materials
BALI
RDVI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BALI vs. RDVI — Risk / Return Rank
BALI
RDVI
BALI vs. RDVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF (BALI) and FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BALI | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.40 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 3.72 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.28 | 15.68 | +2.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BALI vs. RDVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BALI drawdown since its inception was -16.65%, smaller than the maximum RDVI drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALI and RDVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BALI | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.65% | -18.35% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.71% | -8.48% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | 0.00% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.63% | -3.14% | +1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 2.01% | -0.62% |
Volatility
BALI vs. RDVI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF (BALI) is 3.95%, while FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that BALI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BALI | RDVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 4.65% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 11.04% | -2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.44% | 13.78% | -3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.01% | 16.95% | -3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.01% | 16.95% | -3.94% |
BALI vs. RDVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BALI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RDVI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BALI vs. RDVI - Dividend Comparison
BALI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, more than RDVI's 7.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BALI Blackrock Advantage Large Cap Income ETF | 7.74% | 8.51% | 7.13% | 2.13% | 0.00% |
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF | 7.56% | 8.10% | 8.62% | 8.45% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BALI and RDVI have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDVI has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to BALI (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BALI dropped -16.65% vs RDVI's -18.35%.
On 1-year performance, RDVI leads with 31.37% vs 25.38% for BALI. On fees, BALI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BALI has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RDVI has performed better with a 31.37% return vs 25.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BALI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RDVI.
BALI has the higher dividend yield at 7.74%, compared with 7.56% for RDVI.
They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BALI and 0.75% for RDVI.
BALI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BALI and RDVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer