PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BALFX vs. URTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BALFX vs. URTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund (BALFX) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BALFX having a 9.94% return and URTH slightly higher at 10.16%. Over the past 10 years, BALFX has underperformed URTH with an annualized return of 10.08%, while URTH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.19% annualized return.


BALFX

1D
0.24%
1M
3.98%
YTD
9.94%
6M
10.55%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
17.50%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
10.08%

URTH

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.65%
YTD
10.16%
6M
10.88%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
13.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BALFX vs. URTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BALFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund
9.94%18.40%14.91%13.62%-12.19%15.69%10.81%18.50%-3.54%14.63%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
10.16%21.36%18.66%23.95%-17.97%22.27%15.78%28.15%-8.56%22.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BALFX and URTH is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2012

0.84

The correlation between BALFX and URTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BALFX vs. URTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BALFX
BALFX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BALFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BALFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

URTH
URTH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BALFX vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund (BALFX) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BALFXURTHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.93

2.17

+0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.09

3.02

+1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.39

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

2.89

+0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.41

13.11

+3.30

BALFX vs. URTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BALFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the URTH Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BALFX and URTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BALFXURTHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

2.17

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.74

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.77

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.73

-0.04

Drawdowns

BALFX vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BALFX drawdown since its inception was -40.20%, which is greater than URTH's maximum drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALFX and URTH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BALFXURTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.20%

-34.01%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-9.06%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.67%

-16.94%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.81%

-26.05%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.34%

-34.01%

+11.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.74%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-4.37%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.99%

-0.44%

Volatility

BALFX vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds American Balanced Fund (BALFX) is 2.65%, while iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that BALFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BALFXURTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

3.27%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

9.42%

-2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.72%

12.05%

-3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

16.19%

-5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.66%

17.27%

-6.61%

BALFX vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BALFX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

BALFX vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison

BALFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than URTH's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BALFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund
7.49%8.22%7.14%2.02%2.24%4.24%4.31%3.44%5.30%4.66%4.18%5.54%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
1.35%1.48%1.47%1.70%1.68%1.50%1.52%2.16%2.30%1.88%2.15%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BALFX and URTH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

URTH has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to BALFX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BALFX dropped -40.20% vs URTH's -34.01%.

BALFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BALFX and URTH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer