PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BALCX vs. EFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BALCX vs. EFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund Class C (BALCX) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BALCX achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly higher than EFV's 9.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BALCX having a 9.35% annualized return and EFV not far ahead at 9.75%.


BALCX

1D
0.25%
1M
3.91%
YTD
9.64%
6M
10.20%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
9.35%

EFV

1D
-0.78%
1M
2.26%
YTD
9.13%
6M
12.94%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BALCX vs. EFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BALCX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class C
9.64%17.58%14.00%12.97%-12.77%14.87%10.06%17.66%-4.09%14.02%
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
9.13%42.22%5.35%18.85%-5.22%11.08%-2.97%15.80%-14.67%21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between BALCX and EFV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2005

0.80

The correlation between BALCX and EFV shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BALCX vs. EFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BALCX
BALCX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BALCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BALCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

EFV
EFV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BALCX vs. EFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class C (BALCX) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BALCXEFVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.36

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

2.57

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.67

9.57

+6.09

BALCX vs. EFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BALCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the EFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BALCX and EFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BALCXEFVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

1.97

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.76

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.55

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.27

+0.35

Drawdowns

BALCX vs. EFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BALCX drawdown since its inception was -40.88%, smaller than the maximum EFV drawdown of -63.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALCX and EFV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BALCXEFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.88%

-63.94%

+23.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-10.90%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.77%

-13.72%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.22%

-25.84%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.38%

-43.16%

+20.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.51%

+2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.46%

-14.83%

+10.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

2.91%

-1.34%

Volatility

BALCX vs. EFV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class C (BALCX) is 2.66%, while iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that BALCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BALCXEFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

4.52%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

11.56%

-4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.71%

14.21%

-5.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

15.96%

-5.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

17.86%

-7.19%

BALCX vs. EFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BALCX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than EFV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

BALCX vs. EFV - Dividend Comparison

BALCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than EFV's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BALCX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class C
6.93%7.61%6.37%1.54%1.53%3.60%3.68%2.79%4.67%4.17%3.51%4.81%
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
3.81%4.16%4.66%4.36%4.17%4.07%2.42%4.62%4.56%3.56%3.28%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


BALCX and EFV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFV has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to BALCX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BALCX dropped -40.88% vs EFV's -63.94%.

BALCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BALCX and EFV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer