PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAJAJ-AUTO.NS vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAJAJ-AUTO.NS vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a ₹10,000 investment in Bajaj Auto Limited (BAJAJ-AUTO.NS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BAJAJ-AUTO.NS is traded in INR, while COST is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COST values have been converted to INR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAJAJ-AUTO.NS achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 20.56% return. Over the past 10 years, BAJAJ-AUTO.NS has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 17.67%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 26.88% annualized return.


BAJAJ-AUTO.NS

1D
1.16%
1M
4.37%
YTD
12.38%
6M
15.72%
1Y
25.63%
3Y*
33.44%
5Y*
23.16%
10Y*
17.67%

COST

1D
1.18%
1M
-3.73%
YTD
20.56%
6M
16.11%
1Y
3.75%
3Y*
31.38%
5Y*
28.29%
10Y*
26.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAJAJ-AUTO.NS vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAJAJ-AUTO.NS
Bajaj Auto Limited
12.38%8.82%30.23%93.71%15.79%-2.09%12.86%19.31%-16.54%29.05%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
20.56%-0.87%43.85%50.03%-10.35%54.84%36.00%49.40%20.61%14.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BAJAJ-AUTO.NS and COST is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2008

-0.02

The correlation between BAJAJ-AUTO.NS and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAJAJ-AUTO.NS vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAJAJ-AUTO.NS
BAJAJ-AUTO.NS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BAJAJ-AUTO.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAJAJ-AUTO.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAJAJ-AUTO.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BAJAJ-AUTO.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAJAJ-AUTO.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAJAJ-AUTO.NS vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bajaj Auto Limited (BAJAJ-AUTO.NS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAJAJ-AUTO.NSCOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.05

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

0.25

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.46

0.73

+4.72

BAJAJ-AUTO.NS vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAJAJ-AUTO.NS Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAJAJ-AUTO.NS and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAJAJ-AUTO.NSCOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

0.19

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

1.26

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

1.24

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.04

-0.20

Drawdowns

BAJAJ-AUTO.NS vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAJAJ-AUTO.NS drawdown since its inception was -52.38%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -37.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAJAJ-AUTO.NS and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAJAJ-AUTO.NSCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.38%

-37.89%

-14.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-14.92%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.12%

-18.17%

-23.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.12%

-29.68%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.12%

-29.68%

-12.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.83%

-11.83%

-3.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.75%

-6.88%

-3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

7.38%

-2.33%

Volatility

BAJAJ-AUTO.NS vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bajaj Auto Limited (BAJAJ-AUTO.NS) is 7.00%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 9.25%. This indicates that BAJAJ-AUTO.NS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAJAJ-AUTO.NSCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

9.25%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.84%

15.77%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.22%

20.05%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.87%

22.58%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.43%

21.74%

+3.69%

Dividends

BAJAJ-AUTO.NS vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

BAJAJ-AUTO.NS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAJAJ-AUTO.NS
Bajaj Auto Limited
3.47%2.25%0.91%2.05%3.86%4.31%3.49%1.89%2.20%1.65%2.09%1.97%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%

Financials

BAJAJ-AUTO.NS vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bajaj Auto Limited and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. BAJAJ-AUTO.NS values in INR, COST values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BAJAJ-AUTO.NS and COST have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAJAJ-AUTO.NS and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer