BAH vs. PPA
BAH (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation) is a stock, while PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) is Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index. Over the past 10 years, BAH returned 10.92%/yr vs 17.46%/yr for PPA. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BAH vs. PPA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAH achieves a -14.38% return, which is significantly lower than PPA's 14.49% return. Over the past 10 years, BAH has underperformed PPA with an annualized return of 10.92%, while PPA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.46% annualized return.
BAH
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- 13.93%
- 6M
- -17.45%
- YTD
- -14.38%
- 1Y
- -33.39%
- 3Y*
- -14.98%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.42%
PPA
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- 14.49%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- 29.15%
- 5Y*
- 20.46%
- 10Y*
- 17.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $193.12M | $159.29M | $162.22M | |
| $32.88M | $30.28M | $35.30M |
BAH vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | -14.38% | -33.02% | 2.00% | 24.47% | 25.71% | -1.04% | 24.46% | 60.16% | 20.21% | 7.77% |
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 14.49% | 37.15% | 25.28% | 18.41% | 9.52% | 7.09% | 0.45% | 39.63% | -7.51% | 30.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAH and PPA is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2010 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BAH and PPA has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAH vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank
BAH
PPA
BAH vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAH | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.20 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 1.76 | -2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | 4.46 | -5.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAH vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAH drawdown since its inception was -66.59%, which is greater than PPA's maximum drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAH and PPA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAH | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.59% | -57.37% | -9.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.19% | -13.71% | -31.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.59% | -15.24% | -51.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.59% | -18.37% | -48.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.59% | -43.92% | -22.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.18% | -3.37% | -56.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.21% | -9.16% | -2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.15% | 5.38% | +19.77% |
Volatility
BAH vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) has a higher volatility of 13.03% compared to Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) at 7.01%. This indicates that BAH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAH | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.03% | 7.01% | +6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.60% | 17.04% | +14.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.68% | 21.03% | +19.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.92% | 18.80% | +13.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.18% | 20.82% | +8.36% |
Dividends
BAH vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison
BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than PPA's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 3.20% | 2.61% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.65% | 1.75% | 1.42% | 1.35% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 1.66% | 1.69% |
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.59% | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.90% | 0.67% | 1.70% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAH and PPA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAH has higher volatility (13.03%) compared to PPA (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAH dropped -66.59% vs PPA's -57.37%.
PPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAH and PPA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer