PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAH vs. MUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

BAH vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BAH vs. MUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
-4.00%-33.02%2.00%24.47%25.71%-1.04%24.46%60.16%20.21%7.77%
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
22.82%-19.15%41.27%28.20%41.02%53.33%12.06%52.66%-4.63%30.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAH:

$9.90B

MUSA:

$9.32B

EPS

BAH:

$6.77

MUSA:

$24.32

PE Ratio

BAH:

11.88

MUSA:

20.35

PEG Ratio

BAH:

0.39

MUSA:

1.10

PS Ratio

BAH:

0.87

MUSA:

0.49

PB Ratio

BAH:

9.66

MUSA:

14.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAH:

$11.41B

MUSA:

$19.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAH:

$6.01B

MUSA:

$1.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAH:

$1.13B

MUSA:

$940.50M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAH achieves a -4.00% return, which is significantly lower than MUSA's 22.82% return. Over the past 10 years, BAH has underperformed MUSA with an annualized return of 12.13%, while MUSA has yielded a comparatively higher 23.45% annualized return.


BAH

1D
3.00%
1M
3.29%
YTD
-4.00%
6M
-20.55%
1Y
-23.28%
3Y*
-2.88%
5Y*
1.53%
10Y*
12.13%

MUSA

1D
0.17%
1M
22.76%
YTD
22.82%
6M
25.82%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
28.42%
10Y*
23.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAH vs. MUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAH
BAH Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAH Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAH Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

MUSA
MUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAH vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAHMUSADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.58

0.13

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.57

0.40

-0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.06

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

0.19

-0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.84

0.28

-1.12

BAH vs. MUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAH Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the MUSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAH and MUSA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAHMUSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

0.13

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.98

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.76

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.76

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between BAH and MUSA is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BAH vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison

BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than MUSA's 0.46% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
2.79%2.61%1.59%1.47%1.65%1.75%1.42%1.35%1.69%1.78%1.66%1.69%
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
0.46%0.53%0.36%0.43%0.45%0.52%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BAH vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAH drawdown since its inception was -58.75%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAH and MUSA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BAHMUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.75%

-35.54%

-23.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.32%

-31.25%

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.75%

-35.54%

-23.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.75%

-35.54%

-23.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.36%

-10.30%

-45.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.17%

-10.02%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.31%

21.30%

+4.01%

Volatility

BAH vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) at 8.94%. This indicates that BAH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BAHMUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.76%

8.94%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.76%

25.71%

+6.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.05%

36.58%

+3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.42%

29.10%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.39%

30.89%

-2.50%

Financials

BAH vs. MUSA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Murphy USA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
2.62B
4.74B
(BAH) Total Revenue
(MUSA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BAH vs. MUSA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Murphy USA Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
52.0%
0
Portfolio components
BAH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 2.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

MUSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BAH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 230.00M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

MUSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported an operating income of 209.50M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.4%.

BAH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a net income of 200.00M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.

MUSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Murphy USA Inc. reported a net income of 141.90M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.