PortfoliosLab logo
BAH vs. MUSA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BAH and MUSA is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BAH vs. MUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BAH:

-0.47

MUSA:

0.12

Sortino Ratio

BAH:

-0.63

MUSA:

0.25

Omega Ratio

BAH:

0.91

MUSA:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

BAH:

-0.44

MUSA:

0.06

Martin Ratio

BAH:

-0.84

MUSA:

0.14

Ulcer Index

BAH:

23.60%

MUSA:

9.59%

Daily Std Dev

BAH:

33.89%

MUSA:

28.01%

Max Drawdown

BAH:

-44.33%

MUSA:

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

BAH:

-33.10%

MUSA:

-20.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAH:

$15.35B

MUSA:

$8.60B

EPS

BAH:

$6.69

MUSA:

$23.60

PE Ratio

BAH:

18.49

MUSA:

18.45

PEG Ratio

BAH:

2.29

MUSA:

1.69

PS Ratio

BAH:

1.30

MUSA:

0.49

PB Ratio

BAH:

12.68

MUSA:

12.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAH:

$9.01B

MUSA:

$19.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAH:

$4.97B

MUSA:

$1.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAH:

$1.24B

MUSA:

$938.30M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAH achieves a -3.63% return, which is significantly higher than MUSA's -12.28% return. Over the past 10 years, BAH has underperformed MUSA with an annualized return of 17.93%, while MUSA has yielded a comparatively higher 22.55% annualized return.


BAH

YTD

-3.63%

1M

10.19%

6M

-27.65%

1Y

-15.94%

5Y*

13.70%

10Y*

17.93%

MUSA

YTD

-12.28%

1M

-15.49%

6M

-16.57%

1Y

3.32%

5Y*

32.28%

10Y*

22.55%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAH vs. MUSA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAH is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAH is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAH is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAH is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAH is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAH is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

MUSA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MUSA is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MUSA is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MUSA is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MUSA is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MUSA is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MUSA is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BAH vs. MUSA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BAH Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the MUSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAH and MUSA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BAH vs. MUSA - Dividend Comparison

BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than MUSA's 0.54% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
1.68%1.59%1.47%1.65%1.75%1.42%1.35%1.69%1.78%1.66%1.69%9.16%
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
0.54%0.36%0.43%0.45%0.52%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BAH vs. MUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAH drawdown since its inception was -44.33%, which is greater than MUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAH and MUSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BAH vs. MUSA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is 6.11%, while Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) has a volatility of 14.16%. This indicates that BAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BAH vs. MUSA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Murphy USA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20212022202320242025
2.92B
4.53B
(BAH) Total Revenue
(MUSA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BAH vs. MUSA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Murphy USA Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
55.2%
10.7%
(BAH) Gross Margin
(MUSA) Gross Margin
BAH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.61B and revenue of 2.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

MUSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Murphy USA Inc. reported a gross profit of 483.60M and revenue of 4.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.7%.

BAH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 291.26M and revenue of 2.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

MUSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Murphy USA Inc. reported an operating income of 88.00M and revenue of 4.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.

BAH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a net income of 186.95M and revenue of 2.92B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.

MUSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Murphy USA Inc. reported a net income of 53.20M and revenue of 4.53B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.