BAH vs. BWMN
BAH (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation) and BWMN (Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Consulting Services industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, BAH returned 0.11%/yr vs 18.13%/yr for BWMN. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAH vs. BWMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAH achieves a -6.24% return, which is significantly lower than BWMN's -3.88% return.
BAH
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- -6.24%
- 6M
- -4.11%
- 1Y
- -23.32%
- 3Y*
- -7.18%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
BWMN
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- -3.88%
- 6M
- -9.70%
- 1Y
- 24.28%
- 3Y*
- 4.16%
- 5Y*
- 18.13%
- 10Y*
- —
BAH vs. BWMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | -6.24% | -33.02% | 2.00% | 24.47% | 25.71% | 2.12% |
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. | -3.88% | 32.34% | -29.76% | 62.56% | 2.85% | 51.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAH and BWMN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
BAH:
$9.48B
BWMN:
$522.23M
BAH:
$6.91
BWMN:
$0.64
BAH:
11.37
BWMN:
49.97
BAH:
0.33
BWMN:
0.10
BAH:
0.86
BWMN:
1.40
BAH:
8.58
BWMN:
2.08
BAH:
$11.22B
BWMN:
$377.09M
BAH:
$4.99B
BWMN:
$175.89M
BAH:
$1.11B
BWMN:
$42.71M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAH vs. BWMN — Risk / Return Rank
BAH
BWMN
BAH vs. BWMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAH | BWMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.14 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 0.61 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 1.21 | -2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAH | BWMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 | 0.53 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.38 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.37 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
BAH vs. BWMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAH drawdown since its inception was -60.24%, which is greater than BWMN's maximum drawdown of -56.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAH and BWMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAH | BWMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.24% | -56.21% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.07% | -39.93% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.24% | -56.21% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.24% | -56.21% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.40% | -28.56% | -27.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.68% | -20.65% | +9.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.20% | 20.11% | +2.09% |
Volatility
BAH vs. BWMN - Volatility Comparison
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) have volatilities of 12.40% and 12.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAH | BWMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.40% | 12.47% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.84% | 31.36% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.82% | 45.86% | -8.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.00% | 47.34% | -16.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.65% | 47.03% | -18.38% |
Dividends
BAH vs. BWMN - Dividend Comparison
BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, while BWMN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 2.85% | 2.61% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.65% | 1.75% | 1.42% | 1.35% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 1.66% | 1.69% |
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BAH vs. BWMN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BAH and BWMN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BWMN has higher volatility (12.47%) compared to BAH (12.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAH dropped -60.24% vs BWMN's -56.21%.
BWMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAH and BWMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer