BAH vs. BWMN
Compare and contrast key facts about Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN).
Performance
BAH vs. BWMN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAH vs. BWMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | -6.80% | -33.02% | 2.00% | 24.47% | 25.71% | 2.12% |
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. | -13.87% | 32.34% | -29.76% | 62.56% | 2.85% | 51.75% |
Fundamentals
BAH:
$9.62B
BWMN:
$479.95M
BAH:
$6.77
BWMN:
$0.75
BAH:
11.53
BWMN:
37.95
BAH:
0.38
BWMN:
0.08
BAH:
0.85
BWMN:
1.32
BAH:
9.38
BWMN:
1.84
BAH:
$11.41B
BWMN:
$361.05M
BAH:
$6.01B
BWMN:
$183.71M
BAH:
$1.13B
BWMN:
$42.64M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAH achieves a -6.80% return, which is significantly higher than BWMN's -13.87% return.
BAH
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- -6.80%
- 6M
- -20.82%
- 1Y
- -23.53%
- 3Y*
- -3.83%
- 5Y*
- 0.93%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
BWMN
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -15.21%
- YTD
- -13.87%
- 6M
- -32.86%
- 1Y
- 30.28%
- 3Y*
- -0.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAH vs. BWMN — Risk / Return Rank
BAH
BWMN
BAH vs. BWMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAH | BWMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | 0.67 | -1.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | 1.09 | -1.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.16 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 0.64 | -1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 1.56 | -2.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAH | BWMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 | 0.67 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.33 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAH and BWMN is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BAH vs. BWMN - Dividend Comparison
BAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, while BWMN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 2.87% | 2.61% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.65% | 1.75% | 1.42% | 1.35% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 1.66% | 1.69% |
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BAH vs. BWMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAH drawdown since its inception was -58.75%, roughly equal to the maximum BWMN drawdown of -56.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAH and BWMN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAH | BWMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.75% | -56.21% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.32% | -39.93% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.66% | -35.99% | -20.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.16% | -20.37% | +10.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.21% | 16.24% | +8.97% |
Volatility
BAH vs. BWMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) is 9.46%, while Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) has a volatility of 18.87%. This indicates that BAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAH | BWMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.46% | 18.87% | -9.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.63% | 40.23% | -8.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.94% | 45.79% | -5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.40% | 47.34% | -16.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.38% | 47.34% | -18.96% |
Financials
BAH vs. BWMN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities