BAGSX vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAGSX (Baird Aggregate Bond Fund) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF) are both funds - BAGSX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Baird, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. Over the past 10 years, BAGSX returned 1.74%/yr vs 11.93%/yr for FNDF. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. BAGSX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

BAGSX vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAGSX achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 21.21% return. Over the past 10 years, BAGSX has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 1.74%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.93% annualized return.

BAGSX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 5.28%
• 3Y*: 4.25%
• 5Y*: 0.19%
• 10Y*: 1.74%

FNDF

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 6.97%
• YTD: 21.21%
• 6M: 24.72%
• 1Y: 44.71%
• 3Y*: 24.10%
• 5Y*: 13.35%
• 10Y*: 11.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAGSX vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BAGSX Baird Aggregate Bond Fund	0.30%	7.11%	1.63%	6.12%	-13.52%	-1.74%	8.42%	9.17%	-0.55%	3.90%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	21.21%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between BAGSX and FNDF is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	-0.03

The correlation between BAGSX and FNDF shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BAGSX vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAGSX

BAGSX Risk / Return Rank: 24
BAGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
BAGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BAGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
BAGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
BAGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 84
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAGSX vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAGSX	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	2.99	-1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	3.89	-1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.53	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	4.24	-2.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.53	16.19	-10.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAGSX vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAGSX and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAGSX	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	2.99	-1.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	0.83	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	0.68	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	0.54	+0.39

Drawdowns

BAGSX vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAGSX drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAGSX and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAGSX	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.97%	-40.14%	+21.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.84%	-10.60%	+7.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.17%	-13.89%	+7.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.84%	-25.56%	+6.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.97%	-40.14%	+21.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.54%	-0.67%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.52%	-7.64%	+5.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	2.77%	-1.81%

Volatility

BAGSX vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) is 1.29%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that BAGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAGSX	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.29%	5.26%	-3.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.68%	12.53%	-9.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.78%	15.06%	-11.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.93%	16.18%	-10.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.89%	17.67%	-12.78%

BAGSX vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAGSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAGSX vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

BAGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than FNDF's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BAGSX Baird Aggregate Bond Fund	3.80%	3.69%	3.62%	3.10%	2.33%	1.68%	3.02%	2.41%	2.53%	2.21%	1.96%	2.14%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	2.84%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAGSX and FNDF in my portfolio?

BAGSX and FNDF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAGSX or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to BAGSX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAGSX dropped -18.97% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.