BAGSX vs. FNDF
Compare and contrast key facts about Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF).
BAGSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Sep 29, 2000. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013.
Performance
BAGSX vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAGSX vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAGSX Baird Aggregate Bond Fund | -0.31% | 7.11% | 1.63% | 6.12% | -13.52% | -1.74% | 8.42% | 9.17% | -0.55% | 3.90% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 8.23% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 14.97% | 3.61% | 18.46% | -14.21% | 23.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAGSX achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 8.23% return. Over the past 10 years, BAGSX has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 1.81%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.
BAGSX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.26%
- 10Y*
- 1.81%
FNDF
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAGSX vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAGSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BAGSX vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank
BAGSX
FNDF
BAGSX vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAGSX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 2.31 | -1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 3.02 | -1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.46 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.52 | -1.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.16 | 13.78 | -8.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAGSX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 2.31 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.78 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.63 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.49 | +0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAGSX and FNDF is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
BAGSX vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
BAGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than FNDF's 3.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAGSX Baird Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.76% | 3.69% | 3.62% | 3.10% | 2.33% | 1.68% | 3.02% | 2.41% | 2.53% | 2.21% | 1.96% | 2.14% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.18% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
Drawdowns
BAGSX vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAGSX drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAGSX and FNDF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAGSX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.97% | -40.14% | +21.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.64% | -11.08% | +8.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.84% | -25.56% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.97% | -40.14% | +21.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -7.26% | +5.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.53% | -7.72% | +5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 2.83% | -1.91% |
Volatility
BAGSX vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) is 1.64%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 8.06%. This indicates that BAGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAGSX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.64% | 8.06% | -6.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.56% | 11.42% | -8.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.27% | 17.50% | -13.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.91% | 16.05% | -10.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.89% | 17.64% | -12.75% |