PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BAFWX vs. FSELX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BAFWXFSELX
YTD Return17.11%39.26%
1Y Return32.18%64.90%
3Y Return (Ann)3.84%19.44%
5Y Return (Ann)16.67%32.21%
10Y Return (Ann)16.12%27.16%
Sharpe Ratio2.111.95
Sortino Ratio2.842.47
Omega Ratio1.381.33
Calmar Ratio1.992.86
Martin Ratio13.688.45
Ulcer Index2.53%8.26%
Daily Std Dev16.31%35.72%
Max Drawdown-36.86%-81.70%
Current Drawdown-2.44%-10.78%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between BAFWX and FSELX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

BAFWX vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BAFWX achieves a 17.11% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 39.26% return. Over the past 10 years, BAFWX has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 16.12%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.16% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.71%
9.57%
BAFWX
FSELX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAFWX vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAFWX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.


FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
Expense ratio chart for FSELX: current value at 0.68% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.68%
Expense ratio chart for BAFWX: current value at 0.64% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.64%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAFWX vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAFWX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAFWX, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.11
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAFWX, currently valued at 2.84, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.84
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BAFWX, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAFWX, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.99
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BAFWX, currently valued at 13.68, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0013.68
FSELX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FSELX, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.95
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FSELX, currently valued at 2.47, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.47
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FSELX, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FSELX, currently valued at 2.86, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.86
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FSELX, currently valued at 8.45, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.45

BAFWX vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAFWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAFWX and FSELX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.11
1.95
BAFWX
FSELX

Dividends

BAFWX vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

BAFWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than FSELX's 5.04% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BAFWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares
0.01%0.01%0.00%1.82%0.00%0.74%3.71%1.70%0.71%4.73%2.09%1.02%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
5.04%7.20%6.69%6.99%8.13%3.36%26.80%14.65%3.82%16.31%3.48%0.61%

Drawdowns

BAFWX vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAFWX drawdown since its inception was -36.86%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -81.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAFWX and FSELX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.44%
-10.78%
BAFWX
FSELX

Volatility

BAFWX vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) is 4.60%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that BAFWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.60%
8.33%
BAFWX
FSELX