PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAESY vs. CW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAESY vs. CW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAESY achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 40.12% return. Over the past 10 years, BAESY has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 17.22%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 25.25% annualized return.


BAESY

1D
-1.71%
1M
-4.53%
YTD
5.68%
6M
6.71%
1Y
-5.80%
3Y*
27.20%
5Y*
29.81%
10Y*
17.22%

CW

1D
-0.69%
1M
9.54%
YTD
40.12%
6M
42.40%
1Y
67.06%
3Y*
63.94%
5Y*
45.55%
10Y*
25.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAESY vs. CW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
5.68%65.51%1.23%40.91%46.40%14.56%-3.43%34.69%-22.16%13.28%
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
40.12%55.66%59.73%33.98%21.03%19.86%-16.83%38.70%-15.79%24.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BAESY and CW is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAESY:

$73.64B

CW:

$28.61B

EPS

BAESY:

£5.29

CW:

$13.64

PE Ratio

BAESY:

13.78

CW:

56.60

PEG Ratio

BAESY:

2.54

CW:

3.09

PS Ratio

BAESY:

1.01

CW:

8.02

PB Ratio

BAESY:

4.70

CW:

10.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAESY:

£54.56B

CW:

$3.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAESY:

£19.72B

CW:

$1.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAESY:

£7.74B

CW:

$745.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAESY vs. CW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAESY
BAESY Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BAESY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAESY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAESY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BAESY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAESY Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CW
CW Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CW Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CW Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAESY vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAESYCWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.34

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

5.20

-5.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.56

15.10

-15.66

BAESY vs. CW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAESY Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the CW Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAESY and CW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAESY vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAESY drawdown since its inception was -59.20%, roughly equal to the maximum CW drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAESY and CW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAESYCWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.20%

-59.19%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.59%

-12.97%

-10.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.59%

-27.21%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.59%

-27.21%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.13%

-48.73%

+6.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.08%

-0.69%

-20.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.33%

-13.89%

-5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.42%

4.45%

+5.97%

Volatility

BAESY vs. CW - Volatility Comparison

BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) has a higher volatility of 10.47% compared to Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) at 8.87%. This indicates that BAESY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAESYCWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.47%

8.87%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.60%

25.54%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.16%

32.98%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.21%

27.86%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.94%

30.31%

-2.37%

Dividends

BAESY vs. CW - Dividend Comparison

BAESY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than CW's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
2.00%1.90%2.79%2.40%3.09%4.46%7.05%3.66%4.93%5.71%6.26%4.38%
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
0.13%0.17%0.23%0.35%0.45%0.51%0.58%0.47%0.59%0.46%0.53%0.76%

Financials

BAESY vs. CW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAE Systems PLC and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B202120222023202420252026
14.67B
913.69M
(BAESY) Total Revenue
(CW) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BAESY values in GBP, CW values in USD

BAESY vs. CW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BAE Systems PLC and Curtiss-Wright Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%202120222023202420252026
9.2%
36.3%
Portfolio components
BAESY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.

CW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.

BAESY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

CW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

BAESY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems PLC reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.67B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

CW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAESY and CW have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAESY has higher volatility (10.47%) compared to CW (8.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAESY dropped -59.20% vs CW's -59.19%.

CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAESY and CW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer