PortfoliosLab logo
BAESY vs. CW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BAESY and CW is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BAESY vs. CW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BAESY:

1.19

CW:

1.48

Sortino Ratio

BAESY:

1.98

CW:

1.95

Omega Ratio

BAESY:

1.26

CW:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

BAESY:

2.07

CW:

1.83

Martin Ratio

BAESY:

4.66

CW:

5.30

Ulcer Index

BAESY:

9.11%

CW:

9.40%

Daily Std Dev

BAESY:

34.20%

CW:

33.19%

Max Drawdown

BAESY:

-54.58%

CW:

-59.19%

Current Drawdown

BAESY:

-2.58%

CW:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAESY:

$69.66B

CW:

$15.46B

EPS

BAESY:

$3.40

CW:

$11.24

PE Ratio

BAESY:

27.92

CW:

36.49

PEG Ratio

BAESY:

4.78

CW:

2.71

PS Ratio

BAESY:

2.65

CW:

4.81

PB Ratio

BAESY:

4.52

CW:

6.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAESY:

$12.48B

CW:

$3.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAESY:

$1.10B

CW:

$1.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAESY:

$1.77B

CW:

$704.10M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAESY achieves a 66.89% return, which is significantly higher than CW's 15.64% return. Over the past 10 years, BAESY has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 15.94%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 19.52% annualized return.


BAESY

YTD

66.89%

1M

5.74%

6M

47.69%

1Y

40.22%

5Y*

36.45%

10Y*

15.94%

CW

YTD

15.64%

1M

28.77%

6M

14.58%

1Y

47.80%

5Y*

35.63%

10Y*

19.52%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAESY vs. CW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAESY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAESY is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAESY is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAESY is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAESY is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAESY is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAESY is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CW is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CW is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CW is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CW is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CW is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CW is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BAESY vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BAESY Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the CW Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAESY and CW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BAESY vs. CW - Dividend Comparison

BAESY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than CW's 0.20% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BAESY
BAE Systems PLC
1.80%2.77%2.45%3.16%4.45%7.23%3.75%5.11%3.49%3.94%4.36%4.62%
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
0.20%0.23%0.35%0.45%0.51%0.58%0.47%0.59%0.46%0.53%0.76%0.74%

Drawdowns

BAESY vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAESY drawdown since its inception was -54.58%, smaller than the maximum CW drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAESY and CW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BAESY vs. CW - Volatility Comparison

BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) has a higher volatility of 9.63% compared to Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) at 5.16%. This indicates that BAESY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BAESY vs. CW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAE Systems PLC and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20212022202320242025
12.48B
805.65M
(BAESY) Total Revenue
(CW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items