BAESY vs. CW
Compare and contrast key facts about BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BAESY or CW.
Correlation
The correlation between BAESY and CW is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BAESY vs. CW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BAESY:
0.15
CW:
2.46
BAESY:
0.36
CW:
3.08
BAESY:
1.05
CW:
1.44
BAESY:
0.17
CW:
5.23
BAESY:
0.50
CW:
17.69
BAESY:
6.78%
CW:
3.38%
BAESY:
22.31%
CW:
24.27%
BAESY:
-54.57%
CW:
-59.19%
BAESY:
-20.57%
CW:
-8.84%
Fundamentals
BAESY:
$43.60B
CW:
$13.64B
BAESY:
$3.01
CW:
$10.57
BAESY:
19.29
CW:
34.00
BAESY:
3.03
CW:
2.71
BAESY:
$24.56B
CW:
$3.08B
BAESY:
$2.19B
CW:
$1.14B
BAESY:
$3.26B
CW:
$680.05M
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, BAESY has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 11.50%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 18.29% annualized return.
BAESY
0.00%
-8.46%
-10.22%
3.42%
18.34%
11.50%
CW
0.00%
-5.02%
30.79%
59.73%
20.57%
18.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BAESY vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BAESY vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
BAESY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than CW's 0.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAESY BAE Systems PLC | 2.79% | 2.45% | 3.16% | 4.45% | 7.23% | 3.75% | 5.11% | 3.49% | 3.94% | 4.36% | 4.62% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.74% |
Drawdowns
BAESY vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAESY drawdown since its inception was -54.57%, smaller than the maximum CW drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAESY and CW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BAESY vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BAE Systems PLC (BAESY) is 5.09%, while Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a volatility of 10.77%. This indicates that BAESY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BAESY vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAE Systems PLC and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities