BACAX vs. VV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BACAX (BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) are both funds - BACAX is a Energy Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while VV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, BACAX returned 7.95%/yr vs 15.62%/yr for VV. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BACAX charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VV.

Performance

BACAX vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BACAX achieves a 21.66% return, which is significantly higher than VV's 7.90% return. Over the past 10 years, BACAX has underperformed VV with an annualized return of 7.95%, while VV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.

BACAX

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -7.68%
• YTD: 21.66%
• 6M: 22.28%
• 1Y: 28.42%
• 3Y*: 15.42%
• 5Y*: 17.20%
• 10Y*: 7.95%

VV

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: 7.90%
• 6M: 6.95%
• 1Y: 23.37%
• 3Y*: 21.00%
• 5Y*: 12.65%
• 10Y*: 15.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BACAX vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BACAX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund	21.66%	10.53%	3.78%	2.61%	43.02%	42.93%	-29.68%	12.64%	-19.98%	2.07%
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF	7.90%	18.11%	25.25%	27.18%	-19.91%	27.41%	21.04%	31.25%	-4.46%	22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BACAX and VV is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2005	0.58

The correlation between BACAX and VV shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BACAX vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BACAX

BACAX Risk / Return Rank: 30
BACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
BACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
BACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
BACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
BACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

VV

VV Risk / Return Rank: 57
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BACAX vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BACAX	VV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.86	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	2.54	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.33	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	2.55	-0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.24	11.23	-3.99

BACAX vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BACAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the VV Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BACAX and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BACAX vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BACAX drawdown since its inception was -78.88%, which is greater than VV's maximum drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BACAX and VV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BACAX	VV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.88%	-54.81%	-24.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.36%	-9.21%	-3.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.73%	-18.97%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.74%	-25.66%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.92%	-34.28%	-31.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.16%	-3.21%	-7.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.21%	-6.83%	-27.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	2.09%	+1.49%

Volatility

BACAX vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 4.94%. This indicates that BACAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BACAX	VV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.13%	4.94%	+1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.56%	9.93%	+4.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.61%	12.66%	+4.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.51%	17.33%	+6.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.22%	18.21%	+9.01%

BACAX vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BACAX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

BACAX vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

BACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than VV's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BACAX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund	2.03%	2.47%	2.29%	3.06%	2.21%	2.39%	3.38%	2.69%	2.87%	2.48%	1.95%	1.98%
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF	1.00%	1.08%	1.24%	1.41%	1.66%	1.19%	1.46%	1.81%	2.09%	1.75%	1.98%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BACAX and VV in my portfolio?

BACAX and VV have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BACAX or VV?

BACAX has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to VV (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BACAX dropped -78.88% vs VV's -54.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.