PortfoliosLab logo
BACAX vs. VV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BACAX and VV is 0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

BACAX vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

BACAX:

6.69%

VV:

11.39%

Max Drawdown

BACAX:

0.00%

VV:

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

BACAX:

0.00%

VV:

-0.18%

Returns By Period


BACAX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

VV

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BACAX vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BACAX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BACAX vs. VV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BACAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BACAX is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BACAX is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BACAX is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BACAX is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BACAX is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BACAX is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

VV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VV is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VV is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VV is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VV is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VV is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VV is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BACAX vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

BACAX vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

BACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than VV's 1.31% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BACAX
BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund
2.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
1.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BACAX vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BACAX drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BACAX and VV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BACAX vs. VV - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...