PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BABA vs. SCHD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BABA and SCHD is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

BABA vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
68.30%
3.19%
BABA
SCHD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BABA:

2.49

SCHD:

1.23

Sortino Ratio

BABA:

3.33

SCHD:

1.82

Omega Ratio

BABA:

1.40

SCHD:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

BABA:

1.26

SCHD:

1.76

Martin Ratio

BABA:

6.61

SCHD:

4.51

Ulcer Index

BABA:

14.86%

SCHD:

3.11%

Daily Std Dev

BABA:

39.33%

SCHD:

11.39%

Max Drawdown

BABA:

-80.09%

SCHD:

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

BABA:

-53.68%

SCHD:

-3.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a 69.54% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 3.26% return. Over the past 10 years, BABA has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 5.68%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.15% annualized return.


BABA

YTD

69.54%

1M

66.38%

6M

68.31%

1Y

90.46%

5Y*

-7.14%

10Y*

5.68%

SCHD

YTD

3.26%

1M

1.04%

6M

3.19%

1Y

12.82%

5Y*

11.66%

10Y*

11.15%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BABA vs. SCHD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BABA is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BABA is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BABA is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BABA is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BABA is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BABA is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHD is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHD is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHD is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHD is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHD is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHD is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BABA vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BABA, currently valued at 2.49, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.002.491.23
The chart of Sortino ratio for BABA, currently valued at 3.33, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.331.82
The chart of Omega ratio for BABA, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.401.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for BABA, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.261.76
The chart of Martin ratio for BABA, currently valued at 6.61, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.614.51
BABA
SCHD

The current BABA Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABA and SCHD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.49
1.23
BABA
SCHD

Dividends

BABA vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than SCHD's 3.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.46%0.78%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
3.53%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%2.63%

Drawdowns

BABA vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-53.68%
-3.58%
BABA
SCHD

Volatility

BABA vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a higher volatility of 14.84% compared to Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.10%. This indicates that BABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
14.84%
3.10%
BABA
SCHD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab