BABA vs. JNJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ).
Performance
BABA vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BABA vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -16.73% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -20.51% | 96.37% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 18.06% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
Fundamentals
BABA:
$294.60B
JNJ:
$592.77B
BABA:
$37.64
JNJ:
$11.04
BABA:
3.24
JNJ:
22.02
BABA:
0.26
JNJ:
0.73
BABA:
0.29
JNJ:
6.27
BABA:
0.28
JNJ:
7.27
BABA:
$1.01T
JNJ:
$94.19B
BABA:
$411.95B
JNJ:
$68.56B
BABA:
$132.37B
JNJ:
$39.85B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a -16.73% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 18.06% return. Over the past 10 years, BABA has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 4.98%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.
BABA
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -8.42%
- YTD
- -16.73%
- 6M
- -35.09%
- 1Y
- -4.03%
- 3Y*
- 9.31%
- 5Y*
- -10.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.98%
JNJ
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 18.06%
- 6M
- 30.35%
- 1Y
- 56.31%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 11.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABA vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank
BABA
JNJ
BABA vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BABA | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | 3.51 | -3.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.20 | 4.77 | -4.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.64 | -0.62 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 7.48 | -7.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 25.03 | -25.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BABA | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 3.51 | -3.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.69 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.62 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.54 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between BABA and JNJ is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BABA vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than JNJ's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 1.64% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.14% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
Drawdowns
BABA vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and JNJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABA | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.09% | -50.67% | -29.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.58% | -7.22% | -28.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.12% | -18.41% | -55.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.09% | -27.37% | -52.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.48% | -2.22% | -57.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.25% | -11.89% | -25.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.60% | 2.52% | +13.08% |
Volatility
BABA vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a higher volatility of 11.58% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 4.42%. This indicates that BABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BABA | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.58% | 4.42% | +7.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.29% | 10.96% | +18.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.01% | 17.46% | +28.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.10% | 16.67% | +34.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.21% | 18.33% | +24.88% |
Financials
BABA vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alibaba Group Holding Limited and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BABA vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 112.89B and revenue of 280.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 21.22B and revenue of 24.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.4%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 18.44B and revenue of 280.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 5.39B and revenue of 24.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.0%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 16.16B and revenue of 280.91B, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.12B and revenue of 24.56B, resulting in a net margin of 20.8%.