PortfoliosLab logo
BABA vs. HSTC.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BABA and HSTC.L is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

BABA vs. HSTC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-54.10%
-36.51%
BABA
HSTC.L

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BABA:

1.59

HSTC.L:

0.96

Sortino Ratio

BABA:

2.22

HSTC.L:

1.53

Omega Ratio

BABA:

1.28

HSTC.L:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

BABA:

0.95

HSTC.L:

0.55

Martin Ratio

BABA:

4.62

HSTC.L:

2.85

Ulcer Index

BABA:

15.95%

HSTC.L:

12.91%

Daily Std Dev

BABA:

46.46%

HSTC.L:

38.37%

Max Drawdown

BABA:

-80.09%

HSTC.L:

-69.93%

Current Drawdown

BABA:

-61.66%

HSTC.L:

-50.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABA achieves a 40.31% return, which is significantly higher than HSTC.L's 8.71% return.


BABA

YTD

40.31%

1M

-11.53%

6M

21.40%

1Y

65.47%

5Y*

-9.90%

10Y*

3.71%

HSTC.L

YTD

8.71%

1M

-11.54%

6M

10.09%

1Y

40.33%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BABA vs. HSTC.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BABA is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BABA is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BABA is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BABA is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BABA is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BABA is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

HSTC.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HSTC.L is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HSTC.L is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HSTC.L is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HSTC.L is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HSTC.L is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HSTC.L is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BABA vs. HSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for BABA, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
BABA: 1.31
HSTC.L: 1.04
The chart of Sortino ratio for BABA, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
BABA: 1.95
HSTC.L: 1.61
The chart of Omega ratio for BABA, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
BABA: 1.25
HSTC.L: 1.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for BABA, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
BABA: 0.83
HSTC.L: 0.60
The chart of Martin ratio for BABA, currently valued at 3.70, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
BABA: 3.70
HSTC.L: 3.13

The current BABA Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the HSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABA and HSTC.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.31
1.04
BABA
HSTC.L

Dividends

BABA vs. HSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while HSTC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.55%0.78%1.29%
HSTC.L
HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BABA vs. HSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABA drawdown since its inception was -80.09%, which is greater than HSTC.L's maximum drawdown of -69.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABA and HSTC.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-55.11%
-52.68%
BABA
HSTC.L

Volatility

BABA vs. HSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a higher volatility of 20.21% compared to HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTC.L) at 16.71%. This indicates that BABA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
20.21%
16.71%
BABA
HSTC.L