PortfoliosLab logo
BAB vs. BLV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BAB and BLV is -0.14. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

BAB vs. BLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BAB:

0.55

BLV:

0.21

Sortino Ratio

BAB:

0.82

BLV:

0.35

Omega Ratio

BAB:

1.10

BLV:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

BAB:

0.27

BLV:

0.08

Martin Ratio

BAB:

1.30

BLV:

0.38

Ulcer Index

BAB:

3.15%

BLV:

6.19%

Daily Std Dev

BAB:

7.42%

BLV:

11.84%

Max Drawdown

BAB:

-27.80%

BLV:

-38.29%

Current Drawdown

BAB:

-11.53%

BLV:

-28.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAB achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly higher than BLV's 0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, BAB has outperformed BLV with an annualized return of 2.75%, while BLV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.38% annualized return.


BAB

YTD

1.66%

1M

-0.12%

6M

-1.43%

1Y

3.62%

3Y*

1.52%

5Y*

-0.74%

10Y*

2.75%

BLV

YTD

0.78%

1M

-1.09%

6M

-4.25%

1Y

1.61%

3Y*

-2.25%

5Y*

-5.16%

10Y*

1.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF

BAB vs. BLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAB has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BLV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAB vs. BLV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAB is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAB is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAB is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAB is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAB is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAB is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

BLV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLV is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLV is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLV is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLV is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLV is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLV is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BAB vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the BLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAB and BLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BAB vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison

BAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than BLV's 4.70% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BAB
Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF
4.01%3.97%3.65%3.40%2.63%2.96%3.77%4.20%3.96%4.26%4.71%4.59%
BLV
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF
4.70%4.68%4.06%4.17%3.37%5.84%3.57%4.07%3.63%4.16%4.37%3.90%

Drawdowns

BAB vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAB drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, smaller than the maximum BLV drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAB and BLV.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BAB vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB) is 2.21%, while Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) has a volatility of 3.16%. This indicates that BAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...