PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BA vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BA vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Boeing Company (BA) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BA having a -3.01% return and T slightly lower at -3.08%. Over the past 10 years, BA has outperformed T with an annualized return of 6.12%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.62% annualized return.


BA

1D
-3.27%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
-3.01%
6M
3.97%
1Y
-1.34%
3Y*
-0.43%
5Y*
-3.37%
10Y*
6.12%

T

1D
-4.42%
1M
-9.77%
YTD
-3.08%
6M
-4.92%
1Y
-12.10%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
3.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BA vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BA
The Boeing Company
-3.01%22.67%-32.10%36.84%-5.38%-5.95%-33.90%3.34%11.50%94.72%
T
AT&T Inc.
-3.08%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BA and T is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 1984

0.27

The correlation between BA and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BA:

$2.90

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

BA:

72.57

T:

7.73

PEG Ratio

BA:

11.37

T:

0.32

PS Ratio

BA:

1.79

T:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

BA:

$92.18B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BA:

$4.43B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

BA:

$7.13B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BA vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BA
BA Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BA Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BA vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Boeing Company (BA) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.92

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

-0.59

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.12

-1.20

+1.08

BA vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BA Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BA and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

-0.56

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.31

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.15

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.38

-0.08

Drawdowns

BA vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BA drawdown since its inception was -89.45%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BA and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.45%

-64.15%

-25.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.96%

-20.60%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.31%

-20.60%

-27.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.16%

-32.01%

-22.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.92%

-42.35%

-35.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.06%

-18.23%

-32.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.01%

-15.72%

-15.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.80%

10.08%

+0.72%

Volatility

BA vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The Boeing Company (BA) has a higher volatility of 10.97% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 6.96%. This indicates that BA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.97%

6.96%

+4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.54%

17.27%

+7.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.69%

21.86%

+9.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.45%

23.92%

+12.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.57%

23.69%

+17.88%

Dividends

BA vs. T - Dividend Comparison

BA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BA
The Boeing Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.96%2.52%2.12%1.93%2.80%2.52%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.71%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

BA vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Boeing Company and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B40.00B45.00B20222023202420252026
22.22B
33.47B
(BA) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BA and T have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BA has higher volatility (10.97%) compared to T (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BA dropped -89.45% vs T's -64.15%.

BA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BA and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer