BA vs. GEO

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Boeing Company (BA) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO).

Performance

BA vs. GEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Boeing Company (BA) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BA vs. GEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BA The Boeing Company	-4.10%	22.67%	-32.10%	36.84%	-5.38%	-5.95%	-33.90%	3.34%	11.50%	94.72%
GEO The GEO Group, Inc.	14.27%	-42.39%	158.36%	-1.10%	41.29%	-9.92%	-39.13%	-6.80%	-9.35%	5.08%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BA : $165.56B GEO : $2.53B
EPS BA : $2.90 GEO : $1.83
PE Ratio BA : 71.69 GEO : 10.09
PEG Ratio BA : 11.23 GEO : 0.06
PS Ratio BA : 1.79 GEO : 0.98
PB Ratio BA : 30.39 GEO : 1.68
Total Revenue (TTM) BA : $89.46B GEO : $2.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) BA : $4.32B GEO : $1.59B
EBITDA (TTM) BA : -$2.59B GEO : $587.43M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BA achieves a -4.10% return, which is significantly lower than GEO's 14.27% return. Over the past 10 years, BA has outperformed GEO with an annualized return of 6.18%, while GEO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.70% annualized return.

BA

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -8.40%
• YTD: -4.10%
• 6M: -3.74%
• 1Y: 37.98%
• 3Y*: -1.12%
• 5Y*: -3.82%
• 10Y*: 6.18%

GEO

• 1D: 6.29%
• 1M: 22.39%
• YTD: 14.27%
• 6M: -8.86%
• 1Y: -36.57%
• 3Y*: 32.21%
• 5Y*: 19.09%
• 10Y*: 2.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BA vs. GEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BA

BA Risk / Return Rank: 60
BA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
BA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BA Omega Ratio Rank: 58
BA Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
BA Martin Ratio Rank: 61

GEO

GEO Risk / Return Rank: 14
GEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
GEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
GEO Omega Ratio Rank: 12
GEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
GEO Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BA vs. GEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Boeing Company (BA) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BA	GEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	-0.75	+1.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.16	-0.87	+2.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.89	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	-0.66	+1.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.37	-1.01	+3.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BA vs. GEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BA Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the GEO Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BA and GEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BA	GEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64	-0.75	+1.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	0.34	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	0.05	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.29	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between BA and GEO is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BA vs. GEO - Dividend Comparison

Neither BA nor GEO has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BA The Boeing Company	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.96%	2.52%	2.12%	1.93%	2.80%	2.52%
GEO The GEO Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.23%	20.09%	11.56%	9.54%	7.95%	7.24%	8.68%

Drawdowns

BA vs. GEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BA drawdown since its inception was -89.45%, roughly equal to the maximum GEO drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BA and GEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BA	GEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.45%	-86.59%	-2.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.96%	-58.13%	+33.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.33%	-62.49%	+7.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.92%	-77.82%	-0.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.61%	-47.89%	-3.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.97%	-38.91%	+7.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.05%	38.17%	-28.12%

Volatility

BA vs. GEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Boeing Company (BA) is 12.54%, while The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) has a volatility of 14.56%. This indicates that BA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BA	GEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.54%	14.56%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.39%	37.77%	-14.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.99%	50.31%	-13.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.23%	55.89%	-19.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.37%	51.23%	-9.86%

Financials

BA vs. GEO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Boeing Company and The GEO Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Boeing Company reported a gross profit of 1.81B and revenue of 23.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.6%.

GEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 177.79M and revenue of 707.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

BA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Boeing Company reported an operating income of -815.00M and revenue of 23.95B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.4%.

GEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 83.83M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

BA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Boeing Company reported a net income of 8.22B and revenue of 23.95B, resulting in a net margin of 34.3%.

GEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The GEO Group, Inc. reported a net income of 31.77M and revenue of 707.70M, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.