BA vs. GEO

In the year-to-date period, BA achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than GEO's 9.29% return. Over the past 10 years, BA has underperformed GEO with an annualized return of 3.21%, while GEO has yielded a comparatively higher 6.66% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Boeing Company (BA) and The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BA Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the GEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BA and GEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither BA nor GEO has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum BA drawdown since its inception was -88.95%, roughly equal to the maximum GEO drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BA and GEO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The Boeing Company (BA) has a higher volatility of 23.45% compared to The GEO Group, Inc. (GEO) at 17.33%. This indicates that BA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Boeing Company and The GEO Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.