BA.L vs. RMS.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about BAE Systems plc (BA.L) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BA.L or RMS.PA.
Key characteristics
| BA.L | RMS.PA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.20% | 16.38% |
| 1Y Return | 35.15% | 14.31% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 42.53% | 28.85% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 27.93% | 29.34% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 17.48% | 24.84% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.77 | 0.45 |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.43% | 24.49% |
| Max Drawdown | -84.49% | -47.65% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.87% | -7.51% |
Fundamentals
| BA.L | RMS.PA | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | £40.50B | €246.12B |
| EPS | £0.60 | €41.13 |
| PE Ratio | 22.33 | 57.14 |
| PEG Ratio | 3.74 | 5.37 |
| Revenue (TTM) | £23.08B | €13.43B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | £14.06B | €8.21B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | £2.82B | €6.04B |
Correlation
The correlation between BA.L and RMS.PA is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BA.L vs. RMS.PA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BA.L achieves a 22.20% return, which is significantly higher than RMS.PA's 16.38% return. Over the past 10 years, BA.L has underperformed RMS.PA with an annualized return of 17.48%, while RMS.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 24.84% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BA.L vs. RMS.PA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems plc (BA.L) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BA.L vs. RMS.PA - Dividend Comparison
BA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than RMS.PA's 0.61% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BA.L BAE Systems plc | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
RMS.PA Hermès International Société en commandite par actions | 0.61% | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.30% | 0.52% | 0.68% | 1.34% | 0.84% | 0.86% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.95% |
Drawdowns
BA.L vs. RMS.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BA.L drawdown since its inception was -84.49%, which is greater than RMS.PA's maximum drawdown of -47.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BA.L and RMS.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BA.L vs. RMS.PA - Volatility Comparison
BAE Systems plc (BA.L) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) at 7.32%. This indicates that BA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMS.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BA.L vs. RMS.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAE Systems plc and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities