AZPN vs. DT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Aspen Technology, Inc. (AZPN) and Dynatrace, Inc. (DT).

Performance

AZPN vs. DT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aspen Technology, Inc. (AZPN) and Dynatrace, Inc. (DT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AZPN vs. DT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AZPN Aspen Technology, Inc.	0.00%	5.89%	13.39%	7.18%	34.95%	16.85%	7.71%	-9.16%
DT Dynatrace, Inc.	-15.16%	-20.26%	-0.62%	42.79%	-36.54%	39.47%	71.03%	6.08%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) AZPN : $1.14B DT : $1.93B
Gross Profit (TTM) AZPN : $626.06M DT : $1.58B
EBITDA (TTM) AZPN : $332.95M DT : $283.91M

Returns By Period

AZPN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DT

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: -15.16%
• 6M: -23.89%
• 1Y: -23.12%
• 3Y*: -4.56%
• 5Y*: -5.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AZPN vs. DT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DT

DT Risk / Return Rank: 17
DT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
DT Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
DT Omega Ratio Rank: 15
DT Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
DT Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZPN vs. DT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aspen Technology, Inc. (AZPN) and Dynatrace, Inc. (DT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AZPN	DT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.15	—

Correlation

The correlation between AZPN and DT is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AZPN vs. DT - Dividend Comparison

Neither AZPN nor DT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AZPN	DT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-61.77%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-40.91%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-53.31%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-30.15%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	19.78%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AZPN	DT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.21%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.73%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	35.63%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	39.95%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	46.22%	—

Financials