PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWK vs. GWRS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AWK vs. GWRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWK achieves a 4.25% return, which is significantly higher than GWRS's -13.30% return. Over the past 10 years, AWK has outperformed GWRS with an annualized return of 7.12%, while GWRS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.11% annualized return.


AWK

1D
-1.93%
1M
-1.97%
6M
5.36%
YTD
4.25%
1Y
-5.50%
3Y*
-0.08%
5Y*
-2.62%
10Y*
7.12%
ALL TIME*
13.51%

GWRS

1D
-1.24%
1M
-0.21%
6M
-15.74%
YTD
-13.30%
1Y
-22.85%
3Y*
-14.57%
5Y*
-14.31%
10Y*
1.11%
ALL TIME*
1.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$350.60M$305.70M$284.77M
$592.02K$608.89K$849.14K

AWK vs. GWRS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AWK
American Water Works Company, Inc.
4.25%7.40%-3.53%-11.68%-17.89%24.83%26.88%37.79%1.32%29.01%
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
-13.30%-24.33%-9.94%0.95%-20.68%20.65%12.34%33.21%11.84%5.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AWK and GWRS is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2016

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AWK:

$26.66B

GWRS:

$205.95M

EPS

AWK:

$5.78

GWRS:

$0.07

PE Ratio

AWK:

23.22

GWRS:

99.46

PS Ratio

AWK:

4.96

GWRS:

3.52

PB Ratio

AWK:

2.25

GWRS:

2.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

AWK:

$5.28B

GWRS:

$56.59M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AWK:

$2.35B

GWRS:

$16.24M

EBITDA (TTM)

AWK:

$2.53B

GWRS:

$19.29M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWK vs. GWRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AWK
AWK Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWK Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWK Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

GWRS
GWRS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GWRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWRS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GWRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWRS Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AWK vs. GWRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AWKGWRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.90

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

-0.59

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.20

-0.94

+0.74

AWK vs. GWRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWK Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the GWRS Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWK and GWRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AWK vs. GWRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWK drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, smaller than the maximum GWRS drawdown of -63.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWK and GWRS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AWKGWRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.10%

-63.38%

+26.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.45%

-38.17%

+22.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.99%

-48.36%

+29.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.10%

-63.38%

+26.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.10%

-63.38%

+26.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.67%

-60.21%

+38.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

-22.51%

+12.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.86%

23.62%

-14.76%

Volatility

AWK vs. GWRS - Volatility Comparison

American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) have volatilities of 8.37% and 8.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AWKGWRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.37%

8.17%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.93%

26.81%

-9.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.74%

33.79%

-11.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.04%

32.25%

-9.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.83%

33.61%

-9.78%

Dividends

AWK vs. GWRS - Dividend Comparison

AWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than GWRS's 4.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWK
American Water Works Company, Inc.
2.52%2.49%2.41%2.10%1.68%1.25%1.40%1.59%1.96%1.77%2.02%2.23%
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
4.24%3.60%2.62%2.28%2.22%1.71%2.01%2.18%2.81%2.94%1.90%0.00%

Financials

AWK vs. GWRS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Water Works Company, Inc. and Global Water Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

AWK vs. GWRS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between American Water Works Company, Inc. and Global Water Resources, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

AWK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, American Water Works Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 874.00M and revenue of 1.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.5%.

GWRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Global Water Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 13.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AWK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, American Water Works Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 542.00M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.0%.

GWRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Global Water Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 389.00K and revenue of 13.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.9%.

AWK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, American Water Works Company, Inc. reported a net income of 315.00M and revenue of 1.36B, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.

GWRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Global Water Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -366.00K and revenue of 13.29M, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AWK and GWRS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AWK has higher volatility (8.37%) compared to GWRS (8.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWK dropped -37.10% vs GWRS's -63.38%.

AWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWK and GWRS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer