PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWK vs. GWRS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AWK vs. GWRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWK achieves a -2.94% return, which is significantly higher than GWRS's -16.74% return. Over the past 10 years, AWK has outperformed GWRS with an annualized return of 6.64%, while GWRS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.08% annualized return.


AWK

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
-2.94%
6M
-3.80%
1Y
-9.23%
3Y*
-2.72%
5Y*
-2.37%
10Y*
6.64%

GWRS

1D
-2.68%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
-16.74%
6M
-17.42%
1Y
-30.90%
3Y*
-16.60%
5Y*
-13.70%
10Y*
1.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWK vs. GWRS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AWK
American Water Works Company, Inc.
-2.94%7.40%-3.53%-11.68%-17.89%24.83%26.88%37.79%1.32%29.01%
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
-16.74%-24.33%-9.94%0.95%-20.68%20.65%12.34%33.21%11.84%5.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AWK and GWRS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2016

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AWK:

$24.36B

GWRS:

$198.43M

EPS

AWK:

$5.65

GWRS:

$0.07

PE Ratio

AWK:

22.10

GWRS:

95.61

PS Ratio

AWK:

4.68

GWRS:

3.38

PB Ratio

AWK:

2.21

GWRS:

2.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

AWK:

$5.21B

GWRS:

$56.59M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AWK:

$2.27B

GWRS:

$16.24M

EBITDA (TTM)

AWK:

$2.48B

GWRS:

$19.29M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWK vs. GWRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWK
AWK Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWK Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
AWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GWRS
GWRS Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GWRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWRS Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GWRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWRS Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWK vs. GWRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) and Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AWKGWRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.85

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

-0.81

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

-1.46

+0.37

AWK vs. GWRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWK Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is higher than the GWRS Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWK and GWRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AWK vs. GWRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWK drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, smaller than the maximum GWRS drawdown of -63.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWK and GWRS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AWKGWRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.10%

-63.38%

+26.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.45%

-38.17%

+22.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.24%

-48.36%

+26.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.10%

-63.38%

+26.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.10%

-63.38%

+26.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.07%

-61.79%

+34.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-22.10%

+12.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.55%

21.25%

-12.70%

Volatility

AWK vs. GWRS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) is 6.43%, while Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) has a volatility of 12.45%. This indicates that AWK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AWKGWRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

12.45%

-6.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.69%

25.93%

-10.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.79%

34.28%

-12.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.87%

32.15%

-9.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.74%

33.60%

-9.86%

Dividends

AWK vs. GWRS - Dividend Comparison

AWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than GWRS's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWK
American Water Works Company, Inc.
2.70%2.49%2.41%2.10%1.68%1.25%1.40%1.59%1.96%1.77%2.02%2.23%
GWRS
Global Water Resources, Inc.
4.40%3.60%2.62%2.28%2.22%1.71%2.01%2.18%2.81%2.94%1.90%0.00%

Financials

AWK vs. GWRS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Water Works Company, Inc. and Global Water Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.21B
13.29M
(AWK) Total Revenue
(GWRS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AWK vs. GWRS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between American Water Works Company, Inc. and Global Water Resources, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
59.2%
0
Portfolio components
AWK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Water Works Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 714.00M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.

GWRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Water Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 13.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AWK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Water Works Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 391.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.4%.

GWRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Water Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 389.00K and revenue of 13.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.9%.

AWK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Water Works Company, Inc. reported a net income of 196.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.

GWRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Water Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -366.00K and revenue of 13.29M, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AWK and GWRS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWRS has higher volatility (12.45%) compared to AWK (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWK dropped -37.10% vs GWRS's -63.38%.

AWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWK and GWRS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer