AWGIX vs. XLK

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AWGIX (CIBC Atlas All Cap Growth Fund) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both funds - AWGIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by CIBC Private Wealth Management, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 10 years, AWGIX returned 11.91%/yr vs 25.97%/yr for XLK. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AWGIX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.

Performance

AWGIX vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CIBC Atlas All Cap Growth Fund (AWGIX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWGIX achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 37.85% return. Over the past 10 years, AWGIX has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 11.91%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.97% annualized return.

AWGIX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 8.97%
• 6M: 7.84%
• 1Y: 11.42%
• 3Y*: 16.09%
• 5Y*: 8.01%
• 10Y*: 11.91%

XLK

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 22.45%
• YTD: 37.85%
• 6M: 37.41%
• 1Y: 71.15%
• 3Y*: 34.35%
• 5Y*: 24.55%
• 10Y*: 25.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWGIX vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AWGIX CIBC Atlas All Cap Growth Fund	8.97%	6.07%	13.44%	35.47%	-29.76%	25.42%	29.80%	36.12%	2.01%	19.10%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	37.85%	24.61%	21.63%	56.02%	-27.73%	34.74%	43.62%	49.86%	-1.68%	34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between AWGIX and XLK is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2007	0.85

The correlation between AWGIX and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AWGIX vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWGIX

AWGIX Risk / Return Rank: 8
AWGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
AWGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
AWGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
AWGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
AWGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

XLK

XLK Risk / Return Rank: 86
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 87
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWGIX vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Atlas All Cap Growth Fund (AWGIX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AWGIX	XLK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	3.44	-2.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	4.12	-2.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.55	-0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.76	4.56	-3.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.42	15.32	-12.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AWGIX vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWGIX and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AWGIX	XLK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	3.44	-2.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.99	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	1.06	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.42	-0.08

Drawdowns

AWGIX vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWGIX drawdown since its inception was -52.83%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWGIX and XLK.

Drawdown Indicators

	AWGIX	XLK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.83%	-82.05%	+29.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.32%	-15.92%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.79%	-25.66%	-2.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.79%	-33.56%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.47%	-33.56%	-0.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	0.00%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.37%	-34.96%	+22.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.44%	4.74%	+0.70%

Volatility

AWGIX vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CIBC Atlas All Cap Growth Fund (AWGIX) is 4.46%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that AWGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AWGIX	XLK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.46%	6.74%	-2.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.91%	16.64%	-3.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.71%	20.80%	-4.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.46%	24.90%	-4.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.11%	24.49%	-3.38%

AWGIX vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWGIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

AWGIX vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

AWGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AWGIX CIBC Atlas All Cap Growth Fund	5.18%	5.64%	2.60%	1.17%	6.87%	11.20%	7.87%	10.11%	20.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	0.39%	0.54%	0.66%	0.76%	1.04%	0.65%	0.92%	1.16%	1.60%	1.37%	1.74%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AWGIX and XLK in my portfolio?

AWGIX and XLK have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AWGIX or XLK?

XLK has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to AWGIX (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWGIX dropped -52.83% vs XLK's -82.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.