PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVT vs. ARW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AVT vs. ARW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avnet, Inc. (AVT) and Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVT achieves a 94.08% return, which is significantly lower than ARW's 113.13% return. Over the past 10 years, AVT has underperformed ARW with an annualized return of 10.99%, while ARW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.


AVT

1D
1.07%
1M
8.02%
YTD
94.08%
6M
88.89%
1Y
85.37%
3Y*
28.23%
5Y*
21.64%
10Y*
10.99%

ARW

1D
0.92%
1M
8.05%
YTD
113.13%
6M
107.25%
1Y
89.85%
3Y*
20.24%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
14.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVT vs. ARW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVT
Avnet, Inc.
94.08%-5.57%6.43%24.41%3.39%20.16%-14.86%19.88%-7.24%-15.28%
ARW
Arrow Electronics, Inc.
113.13%-2.60%-7.47%16.91%-22.12%38.00%14.82%22.90%-14.25%12.78%

Correlation

The correlation between AVT and ARW is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984

0.60

Over the past year, AVT and ARW have become more correlated (0.87) than their long-term average of 0.60, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AVT:

$7.71B

ARW:

$12.14B

EPS

AVT:

$2.55

ARW:

$13.95

PE Ratio

AVT:

36.27

ARW:

16.84

PEG Ratio

AVT:

0.74

ARW:

5.36

PS Ratio

AVT:

0.31

ARW:

0.37

PB Ratio

AVT:

0.57

ARW:

1.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

AVT:

$24.96B

ARW:

$33.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AVT:

$2.61B

ARW:

$3.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

AVT:

$220.79M

ARW:

$1.18B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVT vs. ARW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVT
AVT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ARW
ARW Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ARW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARW Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ARW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARW Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVT vs. ARW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avnet, Inc. (AVT) and Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVTARWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.47

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

3.84

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.82

9.21

+1.61

AVT vs. ARW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVT Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the ARW Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVT and ARW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVT vs. ARW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVT drawdown since its inception was -84.53%, roughly equal to the maximum ARW drawdown of -86.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVT and ARW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVTARWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.53%

-86.03%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.67%

-23.54%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.12%

-38.16%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.12%

-38.16%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.40%

-52.77%

-5.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

0.00%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.53%

-29.27%

+3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.91%

9.79%

-1.88%

Volatility

AVT vs. ARW - Volatility Comparison

Avnet, Inc. (AVT) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW) at 9.22%. This indicates that AVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVTARWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.74%

9.22%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.05%

26.27%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.57%

34.39%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.23%

29.22%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.20%

29.62%

+1.58%

Dividends

AVT vs. ARW - Dividend Comparison

AVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while ARW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARW
Arrow Electronics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AVT
Avnet, Inc.
1.51%2.83%2.45%2.38%2.65%2.21%2.39%1.93%2.16%1.82%1.43%1.54%

Financials

AVT vs. ARW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Avnet, Inc. and Arrow Electronics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B20222023202420252026
7.12B
9.47B
(AVT) Total Revenue
(ARW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AVT vs. ARW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Avnet, Inc. and Arrow Electronics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%10.5%11.0%11.5%12.0%12.5%13.0%13.5%20222023202420252026
10.4%
11.5%
Portfolio components
AVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avnet, Inc. reported a gross profit of 739.06M and revenue of 7.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.4%.

ARW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arrow Electronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.09B and revenue of 9.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

AVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avnet, Inc. reported an operating income of 205.54M and revenue of 7.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.9%.

ARW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arrow Electronics, Inc. reported an operating income of 361.60M and revenue of 9.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

AVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avnet, Inc. reported a net income of 94.33M and revenue of 7.12B, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.

ARW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arrow Electronics, Inc. reported a net income of 235.11M and revenue of 9.47B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVT and ARW have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVT has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to ARW (9.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVT dropped -84.53% vs ARW's -86.03%.

ARW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVT and ARW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer