AVMA vs. VT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

AVMA (Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVMA is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Avantis, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. AVMA is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVMA returned 14.53%/yr vs 18.64%/yr for VT. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AVMA charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

AVMA vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVMA achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.12% return.

AVMA

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -0.39%
• 6M: 7.65%
• YTD: 10.31%
• 1Y: 19.54%
• 3Y*: 14.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VT

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 7.92%
• YTD: 11.12%
• 1Y: 22.67%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 10.55%
• 10Y*: 12.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVMA vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF	10.31%	16.72%	10.01%	8.36%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	11.12%	22.43%	16.49%	8.76%

Correlation

The correlation between AVMA and VT is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023	0.95

The correlation between AVMA and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AVMA vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVMA

AVMA Risk / Return Rank: 81
AVMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
AVMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AVMA Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AVMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
AVMA Martin Ratio Rank: 82

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 63
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVMA vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVMA	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	1.67	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	2.33	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.30	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	2.35	+0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.78	10.04	+2.75

AVMA vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVMA and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVMA vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVMA drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMA and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVMA	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.81%	-50.27%	+38.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.40%	-9.67%	+3.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.81%	-16.51%	+4.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-1.87%	+0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-6.99%	+5.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.53%	2.26%	-0.73%

Volatility

AVMA vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) is 2.94%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that AVMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVMA	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.94%	4.77%	-1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.64%	11.47%	-3.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.40%	13.68%	-4.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.31%	16.20%	-5.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.31%	17.16%	-6.85%

AVMA vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVMA has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AVMA vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

AVMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF	2.02%	2.21%	2.28%	1.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVMA and VT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, AVMA and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AVMA or VT?

VT has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to AVMA (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVMA dropped -11.81% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which ETF is better, AVMA or VT?

On 3-year performance, VT leads with 18.64% vs 14.53% for AVMA. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, AVMA has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVMA or VT?

Over the 3-year period, VT has performed better with a 18.64% return vs 14.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVMA or VT?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for AVMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVMA or VT?

AVMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 1.59% for VT.

What is the main difference between AVMA and VT?

AVMA is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for AVMA and 0.06% for VT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.