AVLV vs. FNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX).
AVLV and FNDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AVLV is a passively managed fund by American Century Investments that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Value Index. It was launched on Sep 21, 2021. FNDX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both AVLV and FNDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AVLV or FNDX.
Key characteristics
| AVLV | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.59% | 17.04% |
| 1Y Return | 27.34% | 30.19% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.86% | 11.26% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.33 | 2.94 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.20 | 3.96 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.41 | 1.53 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.39 | 4.89 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.74 | 18.78 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.26% | 1.68% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.32% | 10.73% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.34% | -37.71% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.02% | -2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVLV and FNDX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AVLV vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AVLV achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 17.04% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AVLV vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVLV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AVLV vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AVLV vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
AVLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than FNDX's 3.52% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 1.60% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 3.52% | 4.58% | 3.20% | 3.19% | 5.43% | 4.69% | 7.19% | 2.89% | 3.96% | 5.01% | 2.52% | 1.38% |
Drawdowns
AVLV vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVLV drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVLV and FNDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AVLV vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) have volatilities of 2.59% and 2.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.