AVEMX vs. LNG
AVEMX (Ave Maria Value Fund) is Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Ave Maria Mutual Funds, while LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, AVEMX returned 10.67%/yr vs 22.19%/yr for LNG. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AVEMX vs. LNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVEMX achieves a 8.90% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 22.01% return. Over the past 10 years, AVEMX has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of 10.67%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 22.19% annualized return.
AVEMX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- 8.90%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 6.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
LNG
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- -12.41%
- YTD
- 22.01%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- -2.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 23.20%
- 10Y*
- 22.19%
AVEMX vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEMX Ave Maria Value Fund | 8.90% | 2.82% | 21.43% | 3.49% | 4.19% | 25.15% | 6.20% | 20.51% | -8.70% | 17.75% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 22.01% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVEMX and LNG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2001 | 0.40 |
The correlation between AVEMX and LNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.47 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVEMX vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank
AVEMX
LNG
AVEMX vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ave Maria Value Fund (AVEMX) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVEMX | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.44 | -0.07 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | 0.09 | +0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.01 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 0.02 | +0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.30 | 0.05 | +1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVEMX | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | -0.07 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.77 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.68 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.16 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
AVEMX vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVEMX drawdown since its inception was -59.76%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVEMX and LNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVEMX | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.76% | -97.84% | +38.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.20% | -24.09% | +14.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.64% | -24.87% | +6.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.64% | -24.87% | +6.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.76% | -57.53% | +17.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.93% | -20.33% | +12.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.62% | -43.17% | +34.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 11.43% | -7.28% |
Volatility
AVEMX vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ave Maria Value Fund (AVEMX) is 3.61%, while Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a volatility of 9.69%. This indicates that AVEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVEMX | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 9.69% | -6.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.31% | 21.74% | -9.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.41% | 27.75% | -11.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 30.27% | -11.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 32.67% | -14.18% |
Dividends
AVEMX vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison
AVEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than LNG's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEMX Ave Maria Value Fund | 0.31% | 0.34% | 8.81% | 4.42% | 1.15% | 8.07% | 3.57% | 5.27% | 10.76% | 7.84% | 0.00% | 0.12% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.92% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVEMX and LNG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LNG has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to AVEMX (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVEMX dropped -59.76% vs LNG's -97.84%.
AVEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVEMX and LNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer