PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVB vs. BXP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AVB vs. BXP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) and Boston Properties, Inc. (BXP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVB achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than BXP's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, AVB has outperformed BXP with an annualized return of 3.88%, while BXP has yielded a comparatively lower -2.65% annualized return.


AVB

1D
1.45%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.61%
1Y
-9.71%
3Y*
3.34%
5Y*
0.06%
10Y*
3.88%

BXP

1D
0.32%
1M
7.66%
YTD
-2.49%
6M
-4.29%
1Y
-4.76%
3Y*
14.23%
5Y*
-6.68%
10Y*
-2.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVB vs. BXP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVB
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
0.32%-14.60%21.44%20.34%-33.92%62.17%-20.27%24.10%1.00%3.89%
BXP
Boston Properties, Inc.
-2.49%-4.75%12.28%10.98%-38.57%26.21%-28.33%26.09%-10.86%5.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AVB and BXP is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 1997

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between AVB and BXP has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AVB:

$25.33B

BXP:

$10.30B

EPS

AVB:

$8.02

BXP:

$2.00

PE Ratio

AVB:

22.44

BXP:

32.46

PEG Ratio

AVB:

12.90

BXP:

0.07

PS Ratio

AVB:

8.36

BXP:

2.95

PB Ratio

AVB:

2.16

BXP:

2.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

AVB:

$3.06B

BXP:

$3.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AVB:

$2.08B

BXP:

$2.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

AVB:

$1.99B

BXP:

$1.88B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVB vs. BXP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVB
AVB Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
AVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVB Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
AVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVB Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BXP
BXP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXP Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXP Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVB vs. BXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) and Boston Properties, Inc. (BXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVBBXPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.00

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

-0.14

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

-0.28

-0.63

AVB vs. BXP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVB Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the BXP Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVB and BXP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVB vs. BXP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVB drawdown since its inception was -70.04%, roughly equal to the maximum BXP drawdown of -72.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVB and BXP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVBBXPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.04%

-72.80%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.43%

-33.56%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.40%

-39.03%

+9.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.36%

-62.57%

+24.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.91%

-63.59%

+16.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.14%

-39.89%

+19.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.75%

-16.75%

+5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.62%

16.77%

-6.15%

Volatility

AVB vs. BXP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) is 5.94%, while Boston Properties, Inc. (BXP) has a volatility of 8.40%. This indicates that AVB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVBBXPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

8.40%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.45%

20.95%

-5.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.45%

28.51%

-8.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.21%

32.97%

-10.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.73%

32.12%

-7.39%

Dividends

AVB vs. BXP - Dividend Comparison

AVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than BXP's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVB
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
3.91%3.86%3.09%3.53%3.94%2.52%3.96%2.90%3.38%3.18%3.05%2.72%
BXP
Boston Properties, Inc.
4.75%4.98%5.27%5.59%5.80%3.40%4.15%2.78%3.11%2.35%2.15%3.02%

Financials

AVB vs. BXP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AvalonBay Communities, Inc. and Boston Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


550.00M600.00M650.00M700.00M750.00M800.00M850.00M900.00M20222023202420252026
770.28M
872.15M
(AVB) Total Revenue
(BXP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AVB vs. BXP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AvalonBay Communities, Inc. and Boston Properties, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
67.7%
59.1%
Portfolio components
AVB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. reported a gross profit of 521.68M and revenue of 770.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.7%.

BXP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boston Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 515.21M and revenue of 872.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.1%.

AVB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. reported an operating income of 218.54M and revenue of 770.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

BXP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boston Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 227.78M and revenue of 872.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.

AVB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. reported a net income of 325.73M and revenue of 770.28M, resulting in a net margin of 42.3%.

BXP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boston Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 101.58M and revenue of 872.15M, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVB and BXP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BXP has higher volatility (8.40%) compared to AVB (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVB dropped -70.04% vs BXP's -72.80%.

BXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVB and BXP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer