AUZ.AX vs. WAF.AX
Compare and contrast key facts about Australian Mines Limited (AUZ.AX) and West African Resources Limited (WAF.AX).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AUZ.AX or WAF.AX.
Key characteristics
| AUZ.AX | WAF.AX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 30.00% | 62.43% |
| 1Y Return | -7.14% | 87.20% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -62.04% | 3.11% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -37.34% | 29.15% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -13.16% | 32.65% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.10 | 1.67 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.85 | 2.04 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.11 | 1.29 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.13 | 2.02 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.27 | 10.42 |
| Ulcer Index | 49.77% | 8.82% |
| Daily Std Dev | 131.11% | 54.83% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.99% | -92.31% |
| Current Drawdown | -99.97% | -16.58% |
Fundamentals
| AUZ.AX | WAF.AX | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | A$19.58M | A$1.75B |
| EPS | A$0.00 | A$0.15 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | A$148.00K | A$691.19M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | A$142.00K | A$291.56M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -A$2.20M | A$348.47M |
Correlation
The correlation between AUZ.AX and WAF.AX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AUZ.AX vs. WAF.AX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AUZ.AX achieves a 30.00% return, which is significantly lower than WAF.AX's 62.43% return. Over the past 10 years, AUZ.AX has underperformed WAF.AX with an annualized return of -13.16%, while WAF.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 32.65% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AUZ.AX vs. WAF.AX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Australian Mines Limited (AUZ.AX) and West African Resources Limited (WAF.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AUZ.AX vs. WAF.AX - Dividend Comparison
Neither AUZ.AX nor WAF.AX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AUZ.AX vs. WAF.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUZ.AX drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than WAF.AX's maximum drawdown of -92.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUZ.AX and WAF.AX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AUZ.AX vs. WAF.AX - Volatility Comparison
Australian Mines Limited (AUZ.AX) has a higher volatility of 43.07% compared to West African Resources Limited (WAF.AX) at 13.12%. This indicates that AUZ.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAF.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AUZ.AX vs. WAF.AX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Australian Mines Limited and West African Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities