AUSF vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
AUSF and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AUSF is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index (USD). It was launched on Aug 24, 2018. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both AUSF and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AUSF or COWZ.
Correlation
The correlation between AUSF and COWZ is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AUSF vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AUSF:
1.49
COWZ:
0.82
AUSF:
2.20
COWZ:
1.24
AUSF:
1.27
COWZ:
1.15
AUSF:
2.33
COWZ:
1.30
AUSF:
7.85
COWZ:
3.26
AUSF:
2.23%
COWZ:
3.43%
AUSF:
11.78%
COWZ:
13.63%
AUSF:
-44.24%
COWZ:
-38.63%
AUSF:
-5.62%
COWZ:
-6.73%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 17.20% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 11.63% return.
AUSF
17.20%
-4.63%
8.69%
17.50%
13.00%
N/A
COWZ
11.63%
-5.86%
5.57%
11.17%
15.29%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AUSF vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AUSF vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AUSF vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than COWZ's 1.90% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 2.27% | 1.83% | 1.99% | 2.22% | 2.95% | 4.03% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.90% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
AUSF vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.24%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AUSF vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) is 3.39%, while Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that AUSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.