AUMN vs. GFI
Compare and contrast key facts about Golden Minerals Company (AUMN) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AUMN or GFI.
Key characteristics
| AUMN | GFI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -40.39% | -2.85% |
| 1Y Return | -39.24% | 7.08% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -70.68% | 12.70% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -43.30% | 24.47% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -32.71% | 15.78% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.35 | 0.26 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.13 | 0.68 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.02 | 1.09 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.36 | 0.46 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.86 | 0.93 |
| Ulcer Index | 42.08% | 13.76% |
| Daily Std Dev | 103.10% | 49.71% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.97% | -86.06% |
| Current Drawdown | -99.96% | -27.66% |
Fundamentals
| AUMN | GFI | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.01M | $12.55B |
| EPS | -$0.78 | $0.71 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $300.00K | $4.36B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | -$1.60M | $1.11B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -$6.35M | $1.91B |
Correlation
The correlation between AUMN and GFI is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AUMN vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AUMN achieves a -40.39% return, which is significantly lower than GFI's -2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, AUMN has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of -32.71%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.78% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AUMN vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golden Minerals Company (AUMN) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AUMN vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
AUMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUMN Golden Minerals Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 2.84% | 2.86% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.73% | 0.80% | 1.62% | 1.77% | 1.69% | 0.72% | 0.86% | 2.66% |
Drawdowns
AUMN vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUMN drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than GFI's maximum drawdown of -86.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUMN and GFI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AUMN vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
Golden Minerals Company (AUMN) has a higher volatility of 32.69% compared to Gold Fields Limited (GFI) at 15.98%. This indicates that AUMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AUMN vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Golden Minerals Company and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities