AUMN vs. GFI
Compare and contrast key facts about Golden Minerals Company (AUMN) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI).
Performance
AUMN vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AUMN vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUMN Golden Minerals Company | -36.45% | 253.13% | -82.03% | -92.42% | -21.44% | -54.04% | 145.16% | 41.62% | -49.09% | -25.87% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 13.45% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
Fundamentals
AUMN:
$3.49M
GFI:
$43.05B
AUMN:
$0.17
GFI:
$5.39
AUMN:
1.23
GFI:
8.93
AUMN:
4.04
GFI:
5.10
AUMN:
$0.00
GFI:
$13.98B
AUMN:
$0.00
GFI:
$7.34B
AUMN:
-$3.55M
GFI:
$8.04B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUMN achieves a -36.45% return, which is significantly lower than GFI's 13.45% return. Over the past 10 years, AUMN has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of -32.70%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 31.70% annualized return.
AUMN
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -29.39%
- YTD
- -36.45%
- 6M
- -54.76%
- 1Y
- 1.80%
- 3Y*
- -65.43%
- 5Y*
- -58.64%
- 10Y*
- -32.70%
GFI
- 1D
- 6.01%
- 1M
- -14.48%
- YTD
- 13.45%
- 6M
- 18.67%
- 1Y
- 119.94%
- 3Y*
- 58.55%
- 5Y*
- 41.26%
- 10Y*
- 31.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUMN vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
AUMN
GFI
AUMN vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golden Minerals Company (AUMN) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUMN | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 1.98 | -1.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | 2.31 | -1.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.32 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 3.66 | -3.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | 11.55 | -11.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUMN | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 1.98 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.55 | 0.80 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.33 | 0.57 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.15 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between AUMN and GFI is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AUMN vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
AUMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUMN Golden Minerals Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 3.83% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Drawdowns
AUMN vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUMN drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than GFI's maximum drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUMN and GFI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUMN | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -88.05% | -11.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.93% | -34.63% | -29.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.61% | -56.22% | -43.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.70% | -63.09% | -36.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.97% | -19.47% | -80.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.47% | -44.43% | -42.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.47% | 10.97% | +21.50% |
Volatility
AUMN vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
Golden Minerals Company (AUMN) has a higher volatility of 22.72% compared to Gold Fields Limited (GFI) at 19.95%. This indicates that AUMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AUMN | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.72% | 19.95% | +2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.30% | 48.31% | +23.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.83% | 61.00% | +58.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.15% | 51.62% | +55.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 99.37% | 55.33% | +44.04% |
Financials
AUMN vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Golden Minerals Company and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities