PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUEIX vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUEIX vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUEIX achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -2.48% return. Over the past 10 years, AUEIX has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 10.90%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.63% annualized return.


AUEIX

1D
0.43%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
5.72%
6M
4.77%
1Y
8.26%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
10.90%

MOAT

1D
-1.11%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
-2.48%
6M
-3.43%
1Y
12.95%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
13.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUEIX vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AUEIX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund
5.72%6.95%13.85%9.49%-13.81%23.52%13.10%28.63%-0.27%22.14%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-2.48%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between AUEIX and MOAT is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2012

0.81

The correlation between AUEIX and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.81 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUEIX vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUEIX
AUEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AUEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
AUEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUEIX vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AUEIXMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.16

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.05

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.67

3.16

+1.51

AUEIX vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUEIX and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AUEIX vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUEIX drawdown since its inception was -30.82%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUEIX and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUEIXMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.82%

-33.31%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.91%

-12.43%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.27%

-21.44%

+11.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.08%

-23.96%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.82%

-33.31%

+2.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-6.20%

+4.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-3.83%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

4.11%

-2.33%

Volatility

AUEIX vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX) is 3.42%, while VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that AUEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUEIXMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

4.72%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.24%

10.24%

-4.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.38%

14.02%

-5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.04%

18.24%

-5.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.22%

18.70%

-3.48%

AUEIX vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUEIX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUEIX vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

AUEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.47%, more than MOAT's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUEIX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund
21.47%22.70%24.31%24.28%10.26%2.54%1.29%1.12%1.67%2.36%1.99%6.18%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.39%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUEIX and MOAT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to AUEIX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUEIX dropped -30.82% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

AUEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUEIX and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer