PortfoliosLab logo
AUD=X vs. PL=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AUD=X and PL=F is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AUD=X vs. PL=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USD/AUD (AUD=X) and Platinum (PL=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AUD=X:

0.28

PL=F:

0.05

Sortino Ratio

AUD=X:

0.73

PL=F:

-0.03

Omega Ratio

AUD=X:

1.09

PL=F:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

AUD=X:

0.14

PL=F:

-0.07

Martin Ratio

AUD=X:

1.31

PL=F:

-0.48

Ulcer Index

AUD=X:

3.20%

PL=F:

7.83%

Daily Std Dev

AUD=X:

9.21%

PL=F:

25.76%

Max Drawdown

AUD=X:

-56.54%

PL=F:

-68.68%

Current Drawdown

AUD=X:

-25.27%

PL=F:

-47.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUD=X achieves a -3.51% return, which is significantly lower than PL=F's 9.67% return. Over the past 10 years, AUD=X has outperformed PL=F with an annualized return of 2.21%, while PL=F has yielded a comparatively lower -1.40% annualized return.


AUD=X

YTD

-3.51%

1M

-2.95%

6M

2.65%

1Y

2.94%

5Y*

0.21%

10Y*

2.21%

PL=F

YTD

9.67%

1M

8.25%

6M

2.56%

1Y

-0.26%

5Y*

4.92%

10Y*

-1.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AUD=X vs. PL=F — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUD=X
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AUD=X is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AUD=X is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AUD=X is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AUD=X is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AUD=X is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AUD=X is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

PL=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PL=F is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PL=F is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PL=F is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PL=F is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PL=F is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PL=F is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AUD=X vs. PL=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USD/AUD (AUD=X) and Platinum (PL=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AUD=X Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is higher than the PL=F Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUD=X and PL=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

AUD=X vs. PL=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUD=X drawdown since its inception was -56.54%, smaller than the maximum PL=F drawdown of -68.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUD=X and PL=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

AUD=X vs. PL=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USD/AUD (AUD=X) is 2.42%, while Platinum (PL=F) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that AUD=X experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PL=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...